Differences between hatchery-raised and wild blue crabs: Implications for stock enhancement potential

被引:54
|
作者
Davis, JLD
Young-Williams, AC
Aguilar, R
Carswell, BL
Goodison, MR
Hines, AH
Kramer, MA
Zohar, Y
Zmora, O
机构
[1] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Edgewater, MD 20137 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Inst Biotechnol, Ctr Marine Biotechnol, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
D O I
10.1577/T03-004
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Stock enhancement of severely exploited, recruitment-limited fisheries has been controversial for several reasons, one of which is the lack of information about competency, competitiveness, and survivorship of hatchery-reared individuals released into the field. Because enhancement efforts have focused on finfish, even less information is available with which to assess enhancement potential of crustaceans. The Chesapeake Bay stock of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus has declined by more than 80% over the past 12 years and has exhibited recruitment limitation, leading to recent efforts to study the potential of enhancing populations with hatchery-reared juveniles. To assess how hatchery-raised juvenile blue crabs may fare after release into the Chesapeake Bay, we compared several aspects of hatchery and wild crabs. Hatchery crabs readily fed on natural prey, moved in the field similarly to wild crabs, and grew at rates similar to those of wild crabs; however, the two crab groups differed in other factors important to field survival. Prerelease and laboratory-held hatchery crabs had different carapace morphology (smaller spines) than wild crabs, though spine lengths increased to normal proportions by several weeks after release. Hatchery crabs did not initially bury in sediment as often as wild crabs, suggesting inexperience with an important predator escape response. Hatchery crabs were also,preyed upon at higher rates in the field than wild crabs. Conditioning experiments suggest that inexperience with sediment and low burial rates were not the main cause of higher predation. By identifying areas in which hatchery individuals may be relatively weak and deficits that can potentially be mitigated, studies such as this can lead to improving the success of hatchery-raised individuals in the held. On a broader scale, such studies also contribute to determining whether stock enhancement is possible in the case of the Chesapeake blue crab.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DIFFERENCES IN VITELLOGENIN PRODUCTION BETWEEN LABORATORY-RAISED AND WILD FATHEAD MINNOWS: POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR UNDERSTANDING ESTROGENIC EXPOSURE IN WILD POPULATIONS
    Anderson, Jordan R.
    Winkelman, Dana L.
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 (03) : 422 - 423
  • [22] Potential Risks for Seahorse Stock Enhancement: Insight From the Declivity of Genetic Levels With Hatchery Management
    Luo, Wei
    Wu, Qing
    Zhang, Xiaoyang
    Wei, Yuling
    Liao, Min
    Gao, Tong
    Zhang, Yibo
    Zhang, Shoudong
    Chen, Pengyu
    Guo, Zhonggang
    Xiong, Yinlin
    Xu, Zhou
    Du, Zongjun
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 12
  • [23] Prey capture kinematics in hatchery-reared and wild red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus:: Implications for enhancement of wild populations
    Samarco, TJ
    Turingan, RG
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (06) : 744 - 744
  • [24] DIFFERENCES IN GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA BETWEEN HATCHERY AND WILD POPULATIONS OF ONCORHYNCHUS
    NIELSEN, JL
    GAN, C
    THOMAS, WK
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1994, 51 : 290 - 297
  • [25] Differences in Lateral Line Morphology between Hatchery- and Wild-Origin Steelhead
    Brown, Andrew D.
    Sisneros, Joseph A.
    Jurasin, Tyler
    Nguyen, Chau
    Coffin, Allison B.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [26] No evidence for large differences in genomic methylation between wild and hatchery steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
    Blouin, Michael S.
    Thuillier, Virginie
    Cooper, Becky
    Amarasinghe, Vindhya
    Cluzel, Laura
    Araki, Hitoshi
    Grunau, Christoph
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2010, 67 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [27] Microsatellite-based pedigree tracing in a Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus hatchery strain:: implications for hatchery management related to stock enhancement program
    Sekino, M
    Saitoh, K
    Yamada, T
    Kumagai, A
    Hara, M
    Yamashita, Y
    AQUACULTURE, 2003, 221 (1-4) : 255 - 263
  • [28] Comparison of vertebral number between wild and hatchery-reared population, and effect of stock enhancement programs on vertebral number in masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou
    Ando, Daisei
    Shimoda, Kazutaka
    Takeuchi, Katsumi
    Iijima, Anal
    Urabe, Hirokazu
    Shinriki, Yoshihito
    Nakajima, Masamichi
    NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 2019, 85 (05) : 487 - 493
  • [29] Potential effects of stock enhancement with hatchery-reared seed on genetic diversity and effective population size
    Hold, Natalie
    Murray, Lee G.
    Kaiser, Michel J.
    Hinz, Hilmar
    Beaumont, Andrew R.
    Taylor, Martin I.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2013, 70 (02) : 330 - 338
  • [30] Effectiveness of an integrated hatchery program: can genetic-based performance differences between hatchery and wild Chinook salmon be avoided?
    Hayes, Michael C.
    Reisenbichler, Reginald R.
    Rubin, Stephen P.
    Drake, Deanne C.
    Stenberg, Karl D.
    Young, Sewall F.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2013, 70 (02) : 147 - 158