Comparative life cycle environmental impact assessment of renewable electricity generation systems: A practical approach towards Europe, North America and Oceania

被引:10
|
作者
Mahmud, M. A. Parvez [1 ]
Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
关键词
Renewable -energy technologies; Life -cycle assessment; Environmental performance; Greenhouse -gas emission; Uncertainty analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; POLYMER SOLAR-CELLS; ASSESSMENT LCA; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; WIND POWER; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; METHODOLOGY; INVENTORIES; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The choice of a power plant in different nations depends on the required resources availability, abun-dance, and reliability. It is evident that renewable energy generation resources provide a more sus-tainable solution than the fossil fuels. However, as a complete system, renewable energy generation systems also have some overall environmental impacts on humankind and ecosystems. The main objective of this paper is to addresses the environmental effects caused by different types of renewable energy generation systems through process-based life-cycle impact analysis. A comparative study is carried out among different renewable energy generation technologies which include wind, photovol-taic, biomass, and hydro power. Life-cycle impact analysis has been carried out by Institute of Envi-ronmental Sciences (CML), Eco-indicator 99, Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) and Ecopoints 97 approaches. The superiority of this work is creating a comprehensive life-cycle inventory following a reliable global database, assessing the impacts for about 10 midpoint impact categories and three endpoint indicators, and taking account of the fossil-fuel-based energy consumption rate of each plant. The key findings reveal that photovoltaic power plants have the highest environmental impacts in the types of ozone layer depletion, fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity and marine aquatic ecotoxicity, while biomass plants impact on the categories of abiotic depletion, global warming, photochemical oxidation, acidification, and eutrophication. Moreover, the wind power plants have the more significant environ-mental effect on human toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity types. Overall, hydropower plants are found to be much more environment-friendly than other renewable electricity generation systems.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1120
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass utilization for electricity generation in the European Union and the United States
    Beagle, E.
    Belmont, E.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 : 267 - 275
  • [42] COMPARATIVE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BIOMASS UTILIZATION FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES
    Beagle, E.
    Belmont, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 1498 - 1510
  • [43] External environmental costs of electricity generation using a life cycle approach: A case study of Spain
    San Miguel, Guillermo
    Renewable Energy, 2024, 237
  • [44] Comparative study on life cycle environmental impact assessment of copper and aluminium cables
    Bao, Wei
    Lin, Ling
    Song, Dan
    Guo, Huiting
    Chen, Liang
    Sun, Liang
    Liu, Mei
    Chen, Jianhua
    2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND MATERIALS SCIENCE (EEMS 2017), 2017, 94
  • [45] Ecological efficiency of renewable and non-renewable energy generation power systems considering life cycle assessment
    de Paula Santos, Caio Felipe
    Bimestre, Thiago Averaldo
    Tuna, Celso Eduardo
    Silveira, Jose Luz
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 44 (11)
  • [46] Ecological efficiency of renewable and non-renewable energy generation power systems considering life cycle assessment
    Caio Felipe de Paula Santos
    Thiago Averaldo Bimestre
    Celso Eduardo Tuna
    José Luz Silveira
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2022, 44
  • [47] Towards More Holistic Environmental Impact Assessment: Hybridisation of Life Cycle Assessment and Quantitative Risk Assessment
    Kobayashi, Yumi
    Peters, Greg M.
    Khan, Stuart J.
    22ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 : 378 - 383
  • [48] Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment
    Aubin, J.
    Papatryphon, E.
    van der Werf, H. M. G.
    Chatzifotis, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (03) : 354 - 361
  • [49] Prospective analysis of energy security: A practical life-cycle approach focused on renewable power generation and oriented towards policy-makers
    Garcia-Gusano, Diego
    Iribarren, Diego
    Garrain, Daniel
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 190 : 891 - 901
  • [50] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): principles and practical implications for industrial projects
    Rybaczewska-Blazejowska, Magdalena
    Palekhov, Dmitry
    MANAGEMENT-POLAND, 2018, 22 (01): : 138 - 153