Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment

被引:177
|
作者
Aubin, J. [1 ]
Papatryphon, E. [2 ]
van der Werf, H. M. G. [1 ]
Chatzifotis, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Agrocampus Rennes, Sol Agron Spatialisat, UMR1069, F-35042 Rennes, France
[2] European Food Safety Author EFSA, Sci Cooperat Unit, I-431 Parma, Italy
[3] Hellen Ctr Marine Res, Inst Aquaculture, G-71003 Iraklion, Greece
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Production systems; Fish farming; TURBOT SCOPHTHALMUS-MAXIMUS; EUROPEAN SEA-BASS; DICENTRARCHUS-LABRAX; COASTAL AREAS; FISH; AQUACULTURE; NUTRIENT; MARICULTURE; PHOSPHORUS; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
When evaluating the environmental impacts of finfish production systems, both regional impacts (e.g., eutrophication) and global impacts (e.g., climate change) should be taken into account. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method is well suited for this purpose. Three fish farms that represent contrasting intensive production systems were investigated using LCA: rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in freshwater raceways in France, sea-bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in sea cages in Greece, and turbot (Scophtalmus maximus) in an inland re-circulating system close to the seashore in France. Two main characteristics differentiated the three farm systems: feed use and energy use. Emission of nitrogen and phosphorus accounted for more than 90% of each farm's potential eutrophication impact. In the trout and sea-bass systems, feed production was the major contributor to potential climate change and acidification impacts and net primary production use (NPPU). In these systems, the main source of variation for environmental impacts was the feed conversion ratio. Results from this study indicate that the sea-bass cage system was less efficient than the trout raceway system, with a higher level of potential eutrophication (65% greater) and NPPU (15% greater). The turbot re-circulating system was a high energy-consumer compared to the trout raceway system (four times higher) and the sea-bass cage system (five times higher). Potential climate change and acidification impacts were largely influenced by energy consumption in the turbot re-circulating system. In the turbot re-circulating system 86% of energy use was due to on-site consumption, while in the sea-bass cage farming system 72% of energy use was due to feed production. These results are discussed in relation to regional contexts of production and focus attention on the sensitivity of each aquatic environment and the use of energy carriers. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 361
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology
    F. Fallahpour
    A. Aminghafouri
    A. Ghalegolab Behbahani
    M. Bannayan
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2012, 14 (6) : 979 - 992
  • [2] Environmental impact assessment of green roofs using life cycle assessment
    Rasul, M. G.
    Arutla, L. K. R.
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 503 - 508
  • [3] Assessment of environmental impact of the Gayo Arabica coffee production by wet process using life cycle assessment
    Diyarma, Ikhsan
    Bantacut, Tajuddin
    Suprihatin
    [J]. Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis - Series E: Food Technology, 2019, 23 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [4] Life cycle assessment as a tool in environmental impact assessment
    Tukker, A
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2000, 20 (04) : 435 - 456
  • [5] Environmental impact assessment of salmonid feeds using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Papatryphon, E
    Petit, J
    Kaushik, SJ
    van der Werf, HMG
    [J]. AMBIO, 2004, 33 (06) : 316 - 323
  • [6] Environmental Impact of Greenhouse Tomato Production Strategies Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Parrado, C. A.
    Bojaca, C. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TOMATO IN THE TROPICS, 2009, 821 : 125 - 131
  • [7] Environmental impact of Brazilian broiler production process: Evaluation using life cycle assessment
    da Silva Lima, Nilsa Duarte
    Naas, Irenilza de Alencar
    Garcia, Rodrigo Garofallo
    de Moura, Daniella Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
  • [8] The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Karimi, Mahmoud
    Nadimi, Mohammad
    Paliwal, Jitendra
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 80 (01) : 33 - 54
  • [9] Impact of agrochemical emission models on the environmental assessment of paddy rice production using life cycle assessment approach
    Rezaei, Mojtaba
    Soheilifard, Farshad
    Keshvari, Athena
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2021,
  • [10] Environmental impact of beef production in Mexico through life cycle assessment
    Rivera Huerta, Adriana
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    Rubio Lozano, Maria de la Salud
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 109 : 44 - 53