Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment

被引:177
|
作者
Aubin, J. [1 ]
Papatryphon, E. [2 ]
van der Werf, H. M. G. [1 ]
Chatzifotis, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Agrocampus Rennes, Sol Agron Spatialisat, UMR1069, F-35042 Rennes, France
[2] European Food Safety Author EFSA, Sci Cooperat Unit, I-431 Parma, Italy
[3] Hellen Ctr Marine Res, Inst Aquaculture, G-71003 Iraklion, Greece
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Production systems; Fish farming; TURBOT SCOPHTHALMUS-MAXIMUS; EUROPEAN SEA-BASS; DICENTRARCHUS-LABRAX; COASTAL AREAS; FISH; AQUACULTURE; NUTRIENT; MARICULTURE; PHOSPHORUS; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
When evaluating the environmental impacts of finfish production systems, both regional impacts (e.g., eutrophication) and global impacts (e.g., climate change) should be taken into account. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method is well suited for this purpose. Three fish farms that represent contrasting intensive production systems were investigated using LCA: rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in freshwater raceways in France, sea-bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in sea cages in Greece, and turbot (Scophtalmus maximus) in an inland re-circulating system close to the seashore in France. Two main characteristics differentiated the three farm systems: feed use and energy use. Emission of nitrogen and phosphorus accounted for more than 90% of each farm's potential eutrophication impact. In the trout and sea-bass systems, feed production was the major contributor to potential climate change and acidification impacts and net primary production use (NPPU). In these systems, the main source of variation for environmental impacts was the feed conversion ratio. Results from this study indicate that the sea-bass cage system was less efficient than the trout raceway system, with a higher level of potential eutrophication (65% greater) and NPPU (15% greater). The turbot re-circulating system was a high energy-consumer compared to the trout raceway system (four times higher) and the sea-bass cage system (five times higher). Potential climate change and acidification impacts were largely influenced by energy consumption in the turbot re-circulating system. In the turbot re-circulating system 86% of energy use was due to on-site consumption, while in the sea-bass cage farming system 72% of energy use was due to feed production. These results are discussed in relation to regional contexts of production and focus attention on the sensitivity of each aquatic environment and the use of energy carriers. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 361
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF STEAM CYCLE AND COMBINE CYCLE POWER PLANTS USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
    Annisa, Rina
    Faridah, Linda
    Yuliawan, Dwi Muchtar
    Sinisuka, Ngapuli I.
    Dinata, Indra Surya
    Leilan, Fauzi
    Revina, Tania
    Iman, D.
    Samuel, Darma
    [J]. 2018 4TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON POWER ENGINEERING AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (ICPERE 2018), 2018, : 145 - 150
  • [22] Environmental impact evaluation of conventional, organic and organic-plus poultry production systems using life cycle assessment
    Boggia, A.
    Paolotti, L.
    Castellini, C.
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2010, 66 (01) : 95 - 114
  • [23] Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology -: II.: The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems
    Brentrup, F
    Küsters, J
    Lammel, J
    Barraclough, P
    Kuhlmann, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2004, 20 (03) : 265 - 279
  • [24] Environmental impact of cow milk production in the central Italian Alps using Life Cycle Assessment
    Penati, Chiara A.
    Tamburini, Alberto
    Bava, Luciana
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Sandrucci, Anna
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 12 (04) : 584 - 592
  • [25] Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment
    Kebreab, E.
    Liedke, A.
    Caro, D.
    Deimling, S.
    Binder, M.
    Finkbeiner, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (06) : 2664 - 2681
  • [26] Environmental impact assessment of chicken meat production using life cycle assessment (vol 3, pg 262, 2016)
    Kalhor, Talayeh
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 10 (03): : 440 - 441
  • [27] Joint data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment for environmental impact reduction in broiler production systems
    Payandeh, Z.
    Kheiralipour, K.
    Karimi, M.
    Khoshnevisan, B.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 127 : 768 - 774
  • [28] Environmental Impact Assessment of Biorefinery Products Using Life Cycle Analysis
    Kark, Paraskevi
    Papadokonstantakis, Stavros
    Hungerbuehler, Konrad
    Kokossis, Antonis
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS DESIGN, 2014, 34 : 543 - 548
  • [29] Using Life Cycle Assessment methodology to minimize the environmental impact of dryers
    Leonard, A.
    Gerbinet, S.
    [J]. IDS'2018: 21ST INTERNATIONAL DRYING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 33 - 40
  • [30] Environmental and financial life cycle impact assessment of drinking water production at Waternet
    Barrios, Ramiro
    Siebel, Maarten
    van der Helm, Alex
    Bosklopper, Karin
    Gijzen, Huub
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (04) : 471 - 476