Comparative life cycle environmental impact assessment of renewable electricity generation systems: A practical approach towards Europe, North America and Oceania

被引:13
|
作者
Mahmud, M. A. Parvez [1 ]
Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
关键词
Renewable -energy technologies; Life -cycle assessment; Environmental performance; Greenhouse -gas emission; Uncertainty analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; POLYMER SOLAR-CELLS; ASSESSMENT LCA; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; WIND POWER; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; METHODOLOGY; INVENTORIES; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The choice of a power plant in different nations depends on the required resources availability, abun-dance, and reliability. It is evident that renewable energy generation resources provide a more sus-tainable solution than the fossil fuels. However, as a complete system, renewable energy generation systems also have some overall environmental impacts on humankind and ecosystems. The main objective of this paper is to addresses the environmental effects caused by different types of renewable energy generation systems through process-based life-cycle impact analysis. A comparative study is carried out among different renewable energy generation technologies which include wind, photovol-taic, biomass, and hydro power. Life-cycle impact analysis has been carried out by Institute of Envi-ronmental Sciences (CML), Eco-indicator 99, Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) and Ecopoints 97 approaches. The superiority of this work is creating a comprehensive life-cycle inventory following a reliable global database, assessing the impacts for about 10 midpoint impact categories and three endpoint indicators, and taking account of the fossil-fuel-based energy consumption rate of each plant. The key findings reveal that photovoltaic power plants have the highest environmental impacts in the types of ozone layer depletion, fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity and marine aquatic ecotoxicity, while biomass plants impact on the categories of abiotic depletion, global warming, photochemical oxidation, acidification, and eutrophication. Moreover, the wind power plants have the more significant environ-mental effect on human toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity types. Overall, hydropower plants are found to be much more environment-friendly than other renewable electricity generation systems.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1120
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT: A Systems Approach to Environmental Management and Sustainability
    Curran, Mary Ann
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2015, 111 (10) : 26 - 35
  • [32] Implications of integrating electricity supply dynamics into life cycle assessment: A case study of renewable distributed generation
    Ben Amor, Mourad
    Gaudreault, Caroline
    Pineau, Pierre-Olivier
    Samson, Rejean
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 69 : 410 - 419
  • [33] Renewable electricity generation for off grid remote communities; Life Cycle Assessment Study in Alaska, USA
    McCallum, Christopher S.
    Kumar, Narendran
    Curry, Robin
    McBride, Katherine
    Doran, John
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 299
  • [34] Comparative life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation systems in China
    Wang, Yongzhen
    Du, Yanping
    Wang, Junyao
    Zhao, Jun
    Deng, Shuai
    Yin, Hongmei
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 155
  • [35] Exploring the Environmental Impact of Textile Recycling in Europe: A Consequential Life Cycle Assessment
    Sandin, Gustav
    Lidfeldt, Matilda
    Nellstrom, Maja
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [36] Benchmarking Environmental Impacts of Peat Use for Electricity Generation in Ireland-A Life Cycle Assessment
    Murphy, Fionnuala
    Devlin, Ger
    McDonnell, Kevin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (06): : 6376 - 6393
  • [37] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of coal seam gas-based electricity generation
    Hong, Jingmin
    Yu, Zhaohe
    Fu, Xing
    Hong, Jinglan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (10): : 1828 - 1839
  • [38] Environmental Performance of Electricity Generation Based on Resources: A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study in Turkey
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Ozdemir, Alp
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Banar, Mufide
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (11)
  • [39] Comparative life cycle assessment of integrated renewable energy-based power systems
    Shamoushaki, Moein
    Koh, S. C. Lenny
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 946
  • [40] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of coal seam gas-based electricity generation
    Jingmin Hong
    Zhaohe Yu
    Xing Fu
    Jinglan Hong
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 : 1828 - 1839