Comparative life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation systems in China

被引:35
|
作者
Wang, Yongzhen [1 ,2 ]
Du, Yanping [3 ]
Wang, Junyao [4 ]
Zhao, Jun [2 ]
Deng, Shuai [2 ]
Yin, Hongmei [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Energy Internet Res Inst, Dept Elect Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Low & Medium Grade Ene, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China UK Low Carbon Coll, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangdong Res Ctr Climate Change, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Geothermal power generation system; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment; Geothermal reservoir; ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLES; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; CASCADE UTILIZATION; PLANTS; OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCES; SELECTION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104670
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study concerns the assessment of the environmental impacts of geothermal power generation systems using life cycle assessment approach. Particularly, four types of typical geothermal power generation systems in China based on different technologies (double flash, single flash, binary and enhanced geothermal system) are involved in the case study, and critical environmental impacts of acidification potential, global warming potential and eutrophication potential are evaluated for the above geothermal power generation systems based on their energy system analysis models. Analytical results reveal that environmental impacts of geothermal power generation systems are significantly affected by well drilling process. In general, construction process contributes more than 60 % of acidification potential while running process is the major source of eutrophication potential. Environmental impacts vary for each geothermal power generation system due to their different configurations as well as reservoir conditions (namely geothermal gradient). Acidification potential, global warming potential and eutrophication potential of the cases are among 30.43-250.05 mgSO(2)/kWh, 3.88 similar to 80.49 gCO(2)/kWh, 4.78 similar to 32.50 mgPO(4)(3-) /kWh. In particular, environmental impacts of geothermal power generation systems can be largely reduced with a larger geothermal gradient, and it's the reason that South West double Flash geothermal power generation system is with the lowest environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation technologies: An updated review
    Tomasini-Montenegro, C.
    Santoyo-Castelazo, E.
    Gujba, H.
    Romero, R. J.
    Santoyo, E.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 114 : 1119 - 1136
  • [2] A comparative life cycle assessment of marine power systems
    Ling-Chin, Janie
    Roskilly, Anthony P.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 127 : 477 - 493
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of onshore wind power systems in China
    Xu, Lei
    Pang, Mingyue
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Poganietz, Witold-Roger
    Marathe, Sheetal Dattatraya
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 132 : 361 - 368
  • [4] The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass
    Shen, Xinhua
    Kommalapati, Raghava R.
    Huque, Ziaul
    [J]. Sustainability, 2015, 7 (10): : 12974 - 12987
  • [5] Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation
    Bayer, Peter
    Rybach, Ladislaus
    Blum, Philipp
    Brauchler, Ralf
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 : 446 - 463
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of repurposing abandoned onshore oil and gas wells for geothermal power generation
    Li, Jingyi
    Tarpani, Raphael Ricardo Zepon
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    Stamford, Laurence
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 907
  • [7] Sustainable design of geothermal energy systems for electric power generation using life cycle optimization
    Tian, Xueyu
    Meyer, Taylor
    Lee, Hannah
    You, Fengqi
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (04)
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of the Theistareykir geothermal power plant in Iceland
    Kjeld, Alexandra
    Bjarnadottir, Helga Johanna
    Olafsdottir, Ragnheidur
    [J]. GEOTHERMICS, 2022, 105
  • [9] Life cycle sustainability assessment and circularity of geothermal power plants
    Li, Jingyi
    Tarpani, Raphael Ricardo Zepon
    Stamford, Laurence
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 35 : 141 - 156
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of the Theistareykir geothermal power plant in Iceland
    Kjeld, Alexandra
    Bjarnadottir, Helga Johanna
    Olafsdottir, Ragnheiður
    [J]. Geothermics, 2022, 105