Deep learning-based GTV contouring modeling inter- and intra-observer variability in sarcomas

被引:8
|
作者
Marin, Thibault [1 ,3 ]
Zhuo, Yue [1 ,3 ]
Lahoud, Rita Maria [1 ,3 ]
Tian, Fei [1 ,3 ]
Ma, Xiaoyue [1 ,3 ]
Xing, Fangxu [1 ,3 ]
Moteabbed, Maryam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Xiaofeng [1 ,3 ]
Grogg, Kira [1 ,3 ]
Shusharina, Nadya [2 ,3 ]
Woo, Jonghye [1 ,3 ]
Lim, Ruth [1 ,3 ]
Ma, Chao [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Yen-Lin E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
El Fakhri, Georges [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gordon Ctr Med Imaging, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Sarcoma; Radiotherapy planning; Computer-assisted; Deep learning; DELINEATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) is a critical step for radiation therapy treatment planning. The delineation procedure is typically performed manually which exposes two major issues: cost and reproducibility. Delineation is a time-consuming process that is subject to inter- and intra-observer variability. While methods have been proposed to predict GTV contours, typical approaches ignore variability and therefore fail to utilize the valuable confidence information offered by multiple contours. Materials and methods: In this work we propose an automatic GTV contouring method for soft-tissue sarcomas from X-ray computed tomography (CT) images, using deep learning by integrating inter- and intra-observer variability in the learned model. Sixty-eight patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas were considered in this evaluation, all underwent pre-operative CT imaging used to perform GTV delineation. Four radiation oncologists and radiologists performed three contouring trials each for all patients. We quantify variability by defining confidence levels based on the frequency of inclusion of a given voxel into the GTV and use a deep convolutional neural network to learn GTV confidence maps. Results: Results were compared to confidence maps from the four readers as well as ground-truth consensus contours established jointly by all readers. The resulting continuous Dice score between predicted and true confidence maps was 87% and the Hausdorff distance was 14 mm. Conclusion: Results demonstrate the ability of the proposed method to predict accurate contours while utilizing variability and as such it can be used to improve clinical workflow. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 276
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inter- and Intra-Observer Variations in the Delineation of Lesions in Mammograms
    Buelow, Thomas
    Heese, Harald S.
    Grewer, Ruediger
    Kutra, Dominik
    Wiemker, Rafael
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 9416
  • [32] An inter- and intra-observer test of the computer program CRANID
    Lee, Matthew
    Gerdau-Radonic, Karina
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 337
  • [33] Inter- and intra-observer variation in the reporting of cervical smears
    Smith, JHF
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1997, 8 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [34] MRI assessment of tenosynovitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: inter- and intra-observer variability
    Lambot, Karen
    Boavida, Peter
    Damasio, Maria Beatrice
    de Horatio, Laura Tanturri
    Desgranges, Marie
    Malattia, Clara
    Barbuti, Domenico
    Bracaglia, Claudia
    Mueller, Lil-Sofie Ording
    Elie, Caroline
    Bader-Meunier, Brigitte
    Quartier, Pierre
    Rosendahl, Karen
    Brunelle, Francis
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 43 (07) : 796 - 802
  • [35] Inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures: a validation study
    van de Wall, Bryan
    Beeres, F. J. P.
    Link, B.
    Michelitsch, C.
    Houwert, R. M.
    Babst, R.
    Sommer, C.
    Frima, H.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (06) : 735 - 739
  • [36] Inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures: a validation study
    B. J. M. van de Wall
    F. J. P. Beeres
    B. Link
    C. Michelitsch
    R. M. Houwert
    R. Babst
    C. Sommer
    H. Frima
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 735 - 739
  • [37] Inter- and Intra-observer Variability of a Cervical OPLL Classification Using Reconstructed CT Images
    Chang, Han
    Kong, Chae-Gwan
    Won, Ho-Yeon
    Kim, Ju-Hwan
    Park, Jong-Beom
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2010, 2 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [38] Gleason scoring of prostatic carcinoma: Impact of a web-based tutorial on inter- and intra-observer variability
    Mulay, K.
    Swain, M.
    Jaiman, S.
    Gowrishankar, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (01) : 22 - 25
  • [39] Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Measurements of Airways Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
    Storness-Bliss, C.
    Holy, L.
    Lam, S.
    Sin, D. D.
    McWilliams, A. M.
    Coxson, H. O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179
  • [40] Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability and the Effect of Experience in Cine-MRI for Adhesion Detection
    de Wilde, Bram
    Joosten, Frank
    Venderink, Wulphert
    Davidse, Mirjam E. J.
    Geurts, Juliette
    Kruijt, Hanneke
    Vermeulen, Afke
    Martens, Bibi
    Schyns, Maxime V. P.
    Huige, Josephine C. B. M.
    de Boer, Myrte C.
    Tonino, Bart A. R.
    Zandvoort, Herman J. A.
    Lammert, Kirsti
    Parviainen, Helka
    Vuorinen, Aino-Maija
    Syvaeranta, Suvi
    Vogels, Ruben R. M.
    Prins, Wiesje
    Coppola, Andrea
    Bossa, Nancy
    ten Broek, Richard P. G.
    Huisman, Henkjan
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2023, 9 (03)