Risk Factors for Incomplete Healing of the Uterine Incision After Caesarean Section

被引:1
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182022069
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Large defects in the uterine scar occur in a significant proportion of women who have undergone cesarean section; the rate of large scar defects increases with the number of cesarean deliveries. It is unknown whether large scar defects are associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture, placenta accreta, and other complications in subsequent pregnancies compared to intact scars or scars with small defects. This observational cross-sectional study, conducted between 2005 and 2006 at a university hospital, investigated factors that increase the risk of large defects in caesarean scars. The study subjects were 108 women who had undergone only 1 cesarean section. Cesarean scar defects were detected and examined by transvaginal ultrasound examinations performed 6 to 9 months after the cesarean. A large scar defect was defined by the most common sonographic parameters described in the medical literature. Clinical information on the current pregnancy and delivery was obtained from medical records after evaluation of all the ultrasound examinations. The primary study outcome measures were factors predictive of large cesarean scar defects. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Of the 108 women examined, 22 (20%) women had a large cesarean scar defect. Univariate analysis showed that the risk of a large defect increased with the following factors (expressed as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals): cervical dilatation at cesarean (1-4 cm: OR 4.4 [95% CI 0.7-28.5]; 5-7 cm: OR 26.5 [4.3-161.8]; 8 cm or more: OR 32.4 [6.1-171.0]; P < 0.001); station of the presenting part below the pelvic inlet (OR 14.1 [4.6-43.1]; P < 0.001), duration of labor (1-4 hours: OR 2.0 [0.2-23.8]; 5-9 hours: OR 13.0 [2.2-76.6]; 10 hours or more: OR 33.1 [6.6-166.9]; P < 0.001), oxytocin augmentation (OR 6.3 [2.3-17.3]; P < 0.001), or retroflexed uterus (OR 2.9 [1.0-8.3]; P = 0.047). Multivariate analysis showed that no variable associated with the cesarean itself, such as 1-versus 2-layer closure, intraoperative complications, or blood loss, added to the risk resulting from cervical dilatation or the station of the presenting fetal part at the time of delivery. These findings indicate that cesarean section in advanced labor increases the risk of incomplete healing of the uterine incision.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 694
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uterine Rupture after Vaginal Birth in Patients with Previous Caesarean Section
    Manzoor, Ayesha
    Sattar, Faiza
    Zahoor, Asim
    Zahoor, Umer
    Zahoor, Hafiz Ali
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (01): : 634 - 635
  • [42] Uterine Rupture following Caesarean Section
    Moir, C
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1938, 2 : 90 - 90
  • [43] Elective Lower Uterine Segment Caesarean Section and Bilateral Salpingectomy with Body Mass Index 76 and Two Previous Caesarean Sections Including Classical Uterine Incision
    Dimitrov-Zeller, S.
    Iyengar, V.
    Anantharachagan, A.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 63 : 48 - 48
  • [44] Uterine rupture and labour after a previous low transverse caesarean section
    Bujold, E.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (11) : 1337 - 1337
  • [45] Conservative treatment of uterine fistula with abdominal abscess after caesarean section
    Han, S. Y.
    Ryu, K. J.
    Ahn, K. H.
    Cho, S. B.
    Lee, C. H.
    Hong, S. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 35 (06) : 650 - U188
  • [46] The strength of the uterine scar after Caesarean section - An experimental and clinical study
    Mason, NR
    Williams, JT
    [J]. BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL, 1910, 162 : 65 - 72
  • [47] Uterine rupture and labour after a previous low transverse caesarean section
    Turner, MJA
    Agnew, G
    Langan, H
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (06) : 729 - 732
  • [48] Type of Blunt Expansion of the Low Transverse Uterine Incision During Caesarean Section and the Risk of Postoperative Complications: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Morales, Alberto
    Reyes, Osvaldo
    Cardenas, Gerardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2019, 41 (03) : 306 - 311
  • [49] Pathology of the Uterine Scar After Cesarean Section (C-Section) - Prevalence and Risk Factors
    Nour, Corina Madalina
    Postolache, Iulia
    Izvoranu, Silvia
    Steriu, Liliana
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH CONGRESS OF THE ROMANIAN SOCIETY FOR MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERY IN GINECOLOGY / ANNUAL DAYS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH ALESSANDRESCU-RUSESCU, 2019, : 421 - 423
  • [50] Evaluation of “J”-shaped Uterine Incision during Caesarean Section in Patients with Placenta Previa:A Retrospective Study
    邹丽
    钟少平
    赵茵
    朱剑文
    陈莉娟
    [J]. Current Medical Science, 2010, (02) : 212 - 216