Risk Factors for Incomplete Healing of the Uterine Incision After Caesarean Section

被引:1
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182022069
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Large defects in the uterine scar occur in a significant proportion of women who have undergone cesarean section; the rate of large scar defects increases with the number of cesarean deliveries. It is unknown whether large scar defects are associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture, placenta accreta, and other complications in subsequent pregnancies compared to intact scars or scars with small defects. This observational cross-sectional study, conducted between 2005 and 2006 at a university hospital, investigated factors that increase the risk of large defects in caesarean scars. The study subjects were 108 women who had undergone only 1 cesarean section. Cesarean scar defects were detected and examined by transvaginal ultrasound examinations performed 6 to 9 months after the cesarean. A large scar defect was defined by the most common sonographic parameters described in the medical literature. Clinical information on the current pregnancy and delivery was obtained from medical records after evaluation of all the ultrasound examinations. The primary study outcome measures were factors predictive of large cesarean scar defects. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Of the 108 women examined, 22 (20%) women had a large cesarean scar defect. Univariate analysis showed that the risk of a large defect increased with the following factors (expressed as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals): cervical dilatation at cesarean (1-4 cm: OR 4.4 [95% CI 0.7-28.5]; 5-7 cm: OR 26.5 [4.3-161.8]; 8 cm or more: OR 32.4 [6.1-171.0]; P < 0.001); station of the presenting part below the pelvic inlet (OR 14.1 [4.6-43.1]; P < 0.001), duration of labor (1-4 hours: OR 2.0 [0.2-23.8]; 5-9 hours: OR 13.0 [2.2-76.6]; 10 hours or more: OR 33.1 [6.6-166.9]; P < 0.001), oxytocin augmentation (OR 6.3 [2.3-17.3]; P < 0.001), or retroflexed uterus (OR 2.9 [1.0-8.3]; P = 0.047). Multivariate analysis showed that no variable associated with the cesarean itself, such as 1-versus 2-layer closure, intraoperative complications, or blood loss, added to the risk resulting from cervical dilatation or the station of the presenting fetal part at the time of delivery. These findings indicate that cesarean section in advanced labor increases the risk of incomplete healing of the uterine incision.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 694
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A prospective study on risk factors associated with the development of isthmocele after caesarean section
    Shabnam, K.
    Begum, Jasmina
    Singh, Sweta
    Mohakud, Sudipta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2024, 27 (03) : 679 - 688
  • [32] Incisional hernia after elective midline caesarean section: Incidence and risk factors
    Salayta, Wasfi M.
    Al Dahamsheh, Hasan
    [J]. RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 36 (03): : 214 - +
  • [33] Uterine mass after caesarean section: a report of two cases
    Lin-yu Zhou
    Xiao-dan Zhu
    Jian Jiang
    Tian-an Jiang
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [34] Uterine rupture and risk factors for caesarean delivery following induced labour in women with one previous lower segment caesarean section
    Olagbuji, Biodun Nelson
    Okonofua, Friday
    Ande, Adedapo Babatunde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (10): : 1970 - 1974
  • [35] Risk of stillbirth after previous caesarean section
    Kurinczuk, JJ
    Gray, R
    Brocklehurst, P
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 363 (9406): : 402 - 402
  • [36] Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus
    Pomorski, Michal
    Fuchs, Tomasz
    Rosner-Tenerowicz, Anna
    Zimmer, Mariusz
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 205 : 141 - 145
  • [37] Risk factors for the indication of caesarean section in Campinas (SP)
    Carniel, Emilia de Faria
    Zanolli, Maria de Lurdes
    Morcillo, Andre Moreno
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2007, 29 (01): : 34 - 40
  • [38] CLINICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC RISK FACTORS AND COSTS OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION
    Leaper, D. J.
    Holy, C. E.
    Ghosh, E.
    Chen, B. P.
    Edmiston, C. E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S214 - S214
  • [39] Incidence and risk factors for chronic pain after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
    Sng, B. L.
    Sia, A. T. H.
    Quek, K.
    Woo, D.
    Lim, Y.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2009, 37 (05) : 748 - 752
  • [40] RUPTURE OF THE TRANSVERSE UTERINE SCAR AFTER LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION
    LAWRENCE, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE, 1949, 56 (06): : 1024 - 1027