The impact of FDA and EMEA guidelines on drug development in relation to Phase 0 trials

被引:109
|
作者
Marchetti, S. [1 ]
Schellens, J. H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Div Clin Pharmacol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Phase; 0; trial; drug development; microdose; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; toxicity;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603925
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
An increase in the number of identified therapeutic cancer targets achieved through recent biomedical research has resulted in the generation of a large number of molecules that need to be tested further. Current development of ( anticancer) drugs is a rather inefficient process that for an average new molecule takes around 10-15 years. It is also a challenging process as it is associated with high costs and a low rate of approval. It is known that less than 10% of new molecular entities entering clinical Phase I testing progress beyond the investigational programme and reach the market; this probability is even lower for anticancer agents. In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) declared the urgent need for new toolkits to improve the critical development path that leads from scientific discovery to the patient. In this scenario, Phase 0 (zero) trials should allow an early evaluation in humans of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of test compounds through administration of sub-pharmacological doses and for a short time period to a low number of humans. Typically, Phase 0 studies have no therapeutic or diagnostic intent. Owing to the low doses administered and the low risk of toxicity, shorter preclinical packages to support these studies are required. Phase 0 trials have been proposed to help in making an early selection of promising candidates for further evaluation in Phase I-III trials, providing a potentially useful instrument for drug discovery, particularly in the field of oncology. Phase 0 studies are expected to reduce costs of drug development, and to limit the preclinical in vitro and in vivo testing and the time period of drug development. However, there are also concerns about the utility and feasibility of Phase 0 studies. In January 2006, guidelines on exploratory investigational new drug studies in humans have been published by the US FDA, and currently a Phase 0 programme is ongoing at the National Cancer Institute to evaluate the impact ( feasibility and utility) of Phase 0 studies on drug development. In Europe, a Position Paper produced by the Evaluation of Medicinal Products ( EMEA) in 2004 raised the possibility of a reduced preclinical safety package to support early microdose clinical studies, and, as announced by a recent Concept Paper on medicinal products published by the committee for medicinal products for human use of the EMEA, EMEA's guidelines on Phase 0 studies are expected shortly. The true impact of Phase 0 studies on the drug development process as well as on the safety needs to be carefully explored.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 581
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Phase 0 trials could cut drug timelines
    Dorey, Emma
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 2007, (12) : 12 - 12
  • [22] Phase II trials in drug development
    Shelley, JH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 48 (01) : 106 - 107
  • [23] Phase 0 Trials: Expediting the Development of Chemoprevention Agents
    Kummar, Shivaani
    Doroshow, James H.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (03) : 288 - 292
  • [24] The impact of FDA guidance on pharmacogenomic data submissions on drug development
    Little, S
    IDRUGS, 2005, 8 (08) : 648 - 650
  • [25] SOME FDA PERSPECTIVES ON DATA MONITORING IN CLINICAL-TRIALS IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT
    ONEILL, RT
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (5-6) : 601 - 608
  • [26] Impact of a Biomarker-Based Strategy on Oncology Drug Development: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials Leading to FDA Approval
    Fontes Jardim, Denis L.
    Schwaederle, Maria
    Wei, Caimiao
    Lee, J. Jack
    Hong, David S.
    Eggermont, Alexander M.
    Schilsky, Richard L.
    Mendelsohn, John
    Lazar, Vladimir
    Kurzrock, Razelle
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (11):
  • [27] FDA Designations for Therapeutics and Their Impact on Drug Development and Regulatory Review Outcomes
    Kesselheim, A. S.
    Darrow, J. J.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 97 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [28] SOME FDA PERSPECTIVES ON DATA MONITORING IN CLINICAL-TRIALS IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT - DISCUSSION
    MEIER
    ONEILL
    POCOCK
    HERSON
    YUSUF
    BLACKWELDER, W
    ZUCKER, D
    FEIGAL, D
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (5-6) : 609 - 614
  • [29] EMA and FDA psychiatric drug trial guidelines: assessment of guideline development and trial design recommendations
    Boesen, Kim
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2021, 30
  • [30] RE: Impact of a Biomarker-Based Strategy on Oncology Drug Development: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials Leading to FDA Approval
    Freidlin, Boris
    Korn, Edward L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (03):