The impact of FDA and EMEA guidelines on drug development in relation to Phase 0 trials

被引:109
|
作者
Marchetti, S. [1 ]
Schellens, J. H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Div Clin Pharmacol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Phase; 0; trial; drug development; microdose; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; toxicity;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603925
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
An increase in the number of identified therapeutic cancer targets achieved through recent biomedical research has resulted in the generation of a large number of molecules that need to be tested further. Current development of ( anticancer) drugs is a rather inefficient process that for an average new molecule takes around 10-15 years. It is also a challenging process as it is associated with high costs and a low rate of approval. It is known that less than 10% of new molecular entities entering clinical Phase I testing progress beyond the investigational programme and reach the market; this probability is even lower for anticancer agents. In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) declared the urgent need for new toolkits to improve the critical development path that leads from scientific discovery to the patient. In this scenario, Phase 0 (zero) trials should allow an early evaluation in humans of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of test compounds through administration of sub-pharmacological doses and for a short time period to a low number of humans. Typically, Phase 0 studies have no therapeutic or diagnostic intent. Owing to the low doses administered and the low risk of toxicity, shorter preclinical packages to support these studies are required. Phase 0 trials have been proposed to help in making an early selection of promising candidates for further evaluation in Phase I-III trials, providing a potentially useful instrument for drug discovery, particularly in the field of oncology. Phase 0 studies are expected to reduce costs of drug development, and to limit the preclinical in vitro and in vivo testing and the time period of drug development. However, there are also concerns about the utility and feasibility of Phase 0 studies. In January 2006, guidelines on exploratory investigational new drug studies in humans have been published by the US FDA, and currently a Phase 0 programme is ongoing at the National Cancer Institute to evaluate the impact ( feasibility and utility) of Phase 0 studies on drug development. In Europe, a Position Paper produced by the Evaluation of Medicinal Products ( EMEA) in 2004 raised the possibility of a reduced preclinical safety package to support early microdose clinical studies, and, as announced by a recent Concept Paper on medicinal products published by the committee for medicinal products for human use of the EMEA, EMEA's guidelines on Phase 0 studies are expected shortly. The true impact of Phase 0 studies on the drug development process as well as on the safety needs to be carefully explored.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 581
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pharmacogenomics and drug development: the impact of US FDA postapproval tracking on clinical pharmacology
    Farrell, Erin
    Usuka, Jonathan
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [32] Use of phase 0-changes in cancer drug development
    Collins, J.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (12): : 10 - 11
  • [33] Phase zero trials: a novel approach in drug development process
    Fuloria, Neeraj Kumar
    Fuloria, Shivkanya
    Vakiloddin, Syed
    RENAL FAILURE, 2013, 35 (07) : 1044 - 1053
  • [34] Dose optimization in drug development: role of phase IV trials
    Joubert, PH
    OPTIMAL DOSE IDENTIFICATION: EXCERTA MEDICA, 2001, 1220 : 51 - 65
  • [35] Phase II Trials in Drug Development and Adaptive Trial Design
    Van Norman, Gail A.
    JACC-BASIC TO TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, 4 (03): : 428 - 437
  • [36] SOME FDA PERSPECTIVES ON DATA MONITORING IN CLINICAL-TRIALS IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT - CLOSING REMARKS
    BROWN, BW
    POCOCK, S
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (5-6) : 615 - 616
  • [37] Impact of the US FDA "Biopharmaceutics Classification System" (BCS) Guidance on Global Drug Development
    Mehta, Mehul U.
    Uppoor, Ramana S.
    Conner, Dale P.
    Seo, Paul
    Vaidyanathan, Jayabharathi
    Volpe, Donna A.
    Stier, Ethan
    Chilukuri, Dakshina
    Dorantes, Angelica
    Ghosh, Tapash
    Mandula, Haritha
    Raines, Kimberly
    Dhanormchitphong, Pariban
    Woodcock, Janet
    Yu, Lawrence X.
    MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS, 2017, 14 (12) : 4334 - 4338
  • [38] Phase I and phase II clinical trials in sarcoma: Implications for drug discovery and development
    Lee, Daniel Y.
    Staddon, Arthur P.
    Shabason, Jacob E.
    Sebro, Ronnie
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (02): : 585 - 592
  • [39] Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?
    Burt, Tal
    Young, Graeme
    Lee, Wooin
    Kusuhara, Hiroyuki
    Langer, Oliver
    Rowland, Malcolm
    Sugiyama, Yuichi
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2020, 19 (11) : 801 - 818
  • [40] Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?
    Tal Burt
    Graeme Young
    Wooin Lee
    Hiroyuki Kusuhara
    Oliver Langer
    Malcolm Rowland
    Yuichi Sugiyama
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2020, 19 : 801 - 818