FDA Designations for Therapeutics and Their Impact on Drug Development and Regulatory Review Outcomes

被引:31
|
作者
Kesselheim, A. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Darrow, J. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law, Boston, MA USA
关键词
MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS; ACCELERATED APPROVAL; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SAFETY; ORPHAN; BEDAQUILINE; DISEASES; ACT;
D O I
10.1002/cpt.1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
New prescription drugs receive approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on tests establishing safety and adequate and well-controlled trials demonstrating substantial evidence of efficacy. However, a number of legislative and regulatory initiatives, the most recent being the breakthrough therapy designation created in 2012, give the FDA flexibility to approve drugs on the basis of less rigorous data in situations of greater clinical need. These expedited development and review pathways now contribute to a majority of all new drug approvals and have important benefits in encouraging efficient availability of transformative drugs. They also have a number of risks, including a heightened possibility that the drugs will be discovered to be ineffective or unsafe after widespread use, and confusion by patients and physicians over what it means for a product to be FDA approved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initiatives to Speed New Drug Development and Regulatory Review: The Impact of FDA-Sponsor Conferences
    Joseph A. DiMasi
    Michael Manocchia
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 1997, 31 (3): : 771 - 788
  • [2] Initiatives to speed new drug development and regulatory review: The impact of FDA-sponsor conferences.
    DiMasi, JA
    Manocchia, M
    Lasagna, L
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 59 (02) : PII13 - PII13
  • [3] Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy
    Michaeli, Daniel Tobias
    Michaeli, Thomas
    Albers, Sebastian
    Boch, Tobias
    Michaeli, Julia Caroline
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024, 25 (06): : 979 - 997
  • [4] FDA regulatory considerations for oncology drug development
    Moon, Hanlim
    Zang, Dae Young
    Ryu, Min-Hee
    Seo, Yeonsook
    Oh, Bitna
    Hwang, Sunjin
    Farrand, Lee
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 12 (04):
  • [5] DEVELOPMENT OF A COURSE OF STUDY IN FDA DRUG REGULATORY PROCEDURES
    JACOBS, RW
    KING, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 1977, 41 (02) : 185 - 188
  • [6] The FDA's definitions, designations, and drug approvals: too daring?
    不详
    [J]. LANCET HAEMATOLOGY, 2018, 5 (08): : E321 - E321
  • [7] Analysis of the first ten years of FDA's rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program: designations, diseases, and drug development
    Mease, Catherine
    Miller, Kathleen L.
    Fermaglich, Lewis J.
    Best, Jeanine
    Liu, Gumei
    Torjusen, Erika
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [8] A critical review of methods to evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions
    Briesacher, Becky A.
    Soumerai, Stephen B.
    Zhang, Fang
    Toh, Sengwee
    Andrade, Susan E.
    Wagner, Joann L.
    Shoaibi, Azadeh
    Gurwitz, Jerry H.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 (09) : 986 - 994
  • [9] The regulatory functions of microglia in brain development and their application possibility in the drug development and therapeutics
    Sato, Kaoru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 130 (03) : S29 - S29
  • [10] The impact of drug-related QT prolongation on FDA regulatory decisions
    Park, Eunjung
    Willard, James
    Bi, Daoqin
    Fiszman, Monica
    Kozeli, Devi
    Koerner, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (05) : 4975 - 4976