Full-field digital mammography

被引:28
|
作者
Bick, U
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Klinikum Charite, Inst Radiol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
digital mammography; breast cancer; screening; PACS; computer-assisted diagnosis;
D O I
10.1055/s-2000-9210
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Due to the extremely high image quality requirements in mammography, there has for a long time been no adequate digital alternative to conventional film-screen mammography. The longest experience so far exists with digital mammography on the basis of storage phosphor (CR) systems. However, at normal dose this technique has a relatively poor signal-to-noise ratio and has not found general acceptance. Recently three novel systems for digital mammography by the companies Fischer (slot-scan detector), Trex (CCD-array), and GE (amorphous silicon detector) have been introduced and are currently under clinical investigation. The main advantage of digital mammography is the linear relationship between dose and detector signal with the possibility of a tailored optimization of image contrast. Other advantages include digital image storage, telemammography, and computer-assisted diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 964
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of reading times in full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    SJ Connor
    YY Lim
    C Tate
    H Entwistle
    J Morris
    S Whiteside
    J Sergeant
    M Wilson
    U Beetles
    C Boggis
    F Gilbert
    S Astley
    Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [42] Breast mass classification on full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography
    Shi, Jiazheng
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Ge, Jun
    Wei, Jun
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 371 - 377
  • [43] Full-field digital mammography in comparison to screen-film mammography - A phantom study
    Obenauer, S
    Schorn, C
    Funke, M
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    Hermann, KP
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 499 - 503
  • [44] Clinical performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 283
  • [45] Comparison of Mass Size Measurements: Synthesized Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Sendur, Halit Nahit
    Cerit, Mahi Nur
    Gultekin, Serap
    Cindil, Emetullah
    Kilic, Pinar
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 766 - 773
  • [46] Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kwak, Jin Young
    Son, Eun Ju
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Choi, Seon Hyeong
    Han, Mooyoung
    Oh, Ki Keun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) : 310 - 317
  • [47] A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Michell, M. J.
    Iqbal, A.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Douiri, A.
    Wilson, R.
    Whelehan, P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (10) : 976 - 981
  • [48] Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
    Min Jung Kim
    Eun-Kyung Kim
    Jin Young Kwak
    Eun Ju Son
    Ji Hyun Youk
    Seon Hyeong Choi
    Mooyoung Han
    Ki Keun Oh
    European Radiology, 2009, 19 : 310 - 317
  • [49] Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography
    Gennaro, Gisella
    di Maggio, Cosimo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (11) : 2559 - 2566
  • [50] FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY - SYSTEM-DEVELOPMENT AND IMAGE EVALUATION
    FEIG, SA
    YAFFE, MJ
    PLEWES, DB
    MAIDMENT, AD
    MAWDSLEY, GE
    JONG, RA
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 170 - 170