Analysis of industry equilibria in models with sustaining and disruptive technology

被引:35
|
作者
Huang, Xiao
Sosic, Greys [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
Disruptive technology; Competition; Capacity; Pricing; Nash equilibrium; New product introduction; PRICE-COMPETITION; CAPACITY; PRODUCT; INVESTMENT; MARKET; POSTPONEMENT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.033
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes a special type of technology evolution, referred to in the literature as disruptive technology vs. sustaining technology. In general, "old" products based on sustaining technology are perceived to be superior to the "new" ones based on disruptive technology. However, the latter have distinctive features that allow them to attract an exclusive set of customers. Examples include notebooks vs. netbooks, hard-disk drives vs. solid-state drives, laser printers vs. inkjet printers, etc. We consider a model with an established firm and an entrant firm that have heterogeneous product-offering capabilities: the established firm can offer either or both types of products, while the entrant firm can only offer new products. Firms make capacity, pricing, and quantity decisions that maximize their ex-ante profit. Within this framework, we analyze deterministic games with perfect information and stochastic games with uncertain valuation of the disruptive technology. Equilibrium decisions are discussed under various market conditions, as well as under dedicated vs. flexible capacity assumptions. While over-investment and over-production may occur in a stochastic game with dedicated capacities, the equilibrium capacity decisions seem to be more "rational" if the established firm utilizes flexibly capacity, or if the dedicated capacity can be converted ex-post (albeit at some expense). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations
    Kassicieh, SK
    Walsh, ST
    Romig, A
    Cummings, J
    McWhorter, P
    Williams, D
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE KNOWLEDGE ERA, 2001, : 109 - 116
  • [2] Jurassic technology?: Sustaining presumptions of intersubjectivity in a disruptive environment
    Jansen, Robert S.
    [J]. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 2008, 37 (02) : 127 - 159
  • [3] Jurassic technology? Sustaining presumptions of intersubjectivity in a disruptive environment
    Robert S. Jansen
    [J]. Theory and Society, 2008, 37 : 127 - 159
  • [4] DISRUPTIVE VS. SUSTAINING TECHNOLOGY AND THE DESIGN PROCESS
    Kaldate, Amit
    Thurston, Deborah
    Rood, Mark
    [J]. ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 7: DESIGN FOR X, DESIGN TO X, 2009, : 277 - +
  • [5] Managing disruptive technology in the textile industry
    Fianti, N
    Kaounides, L
    Stingelin-Stutzmann, N
    [J]. MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 21 (01) : 7 - 14
  • [6] Analysis on Development Path Influenced by Disruptive Technology in Book Publishing Industry
    Cheng, Haiyan
    Du, Hongyu
    [J]. EDUCATION INNOVATION AND PRACTICE, VOL II, 2016, : 757 - 762
  • [7] The Implication of Blockchain as a Disruptive Technology for Construction Industry
    Sharma, Mohita Gangwar
    Kumar, Sunil
    [J]. IIM KOZHIKODE SOCIETY & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 9 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [8] PHAs: A disruptive technology for the plastics/chemicals industry.
    Barber, J
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 226 : U381 - U381
  • [9] Disruptive technology and AI in the banking industry of an emerging market
    Omoge, Akinyemi Paul
    Gala, Prachi
    Horky, Alisha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2022, 40 (06) : 1217 - 1247
  • [10] INDUSTRY 4.0 AND NATIONAL SECURITY: THE PHENOMENON OF DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY
    Limba, Tadas
    Stankevicius, Andrius
    Andrulevicius, Antanas
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2019, 6 (03): : 1528 - 1535