Analysis of industry equilibria in models with sustaining and disruptive technology

被引:35
|
作者
Huang, Xiao
Sosic, Greys [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
Disruptive technology; Competition; Capacity; Pricing; Nash equilibrium; New product introduction; PRICE-COMPETITION; CAPACITY; PRODUCT; INVESTMENT; MARKET; POSTPONEMENT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.033
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes a special type of technology evolution, referred to in the literature as disruptive technology vs. sustaining technology. In general, "old" products based on sustaining technology are perceived to be superior to the "new" ones based on disruptive technology. However, the latter have distinctive features that allow them to attract an exclusive set of customers. Examples include notebooks vs. netbooks, hard-disk drives vs. solid-state drives, laser printers vs. inkjet printers, etc. We consider a model with an established firm and an entrant firm that have heterogeneous product-offering capabilities: the established firm can offer either or both types of products, while the entrant firm can only offer new products. Firms make capacity, pricing, and quantity decisions that maximize their ex-ante profit. Within this framework, we analyze deterministic games with perfect information and stochastic games with uncertain valuation of the disruptive technology. Equilibrium decisions are discussed under various market conditions, as well as under dedicated vs. flexible capacity assumptions. While over-investment and over-production may occur in a stochastic game with dedicated capacities, the equilibrium capacity decisions seem to be more "rational" if the established firm utilizes flexibly capacity, or if the dedicated capacity can be converted ex-post (albeit at some expense). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustaining technology
    Webb, R
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 2005, (174) : 70 - 77
  • [32] NFTs for 3D Models: Sustaining Ownership in Industry 4.0
    Mouris, Dimitris
    Tsoutsos, Nektarios Georgios
    [J]. IEEE CONSUMER ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2024, 13 (05) : 13 - 22
  • [33] The disruptive mobile wallet in the hospitality industry: An extended mobile technology acceptance model
    Lew, Susan
    Tan, Garry Wei-Han
    Loh, Xiu-Ming
    Hew, Jun-Jie
    Ooi, Keng-Boon
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 63
  • [34] The Evolution of China's LED Industry from the View of Disruptive Technology Innovation
    Ye, Xuanting
    Yang, Defang
    Zhang, Jian
    Liu, Yun
    Yin, Jingru
    [J]. 2018 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET '18): MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: THE ENGINE FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2018,
  • [35] Sustaining an industry obsession
    Gupta, R
    [J]. IEEE DESIGN & TEST OF COMPUTERS, 2002, 19 (05): : 1 - 1
  • [36] Differences between early adopters of disruptive and sustaining innovations
    Reinhardt, Ronny
    Gurtner, Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2015, 68 (01) : 137 - 145
  • [37] The Impact of Disruptive and Sustaining Digital Technologies on Scholarly Journals
    Greco, Albert N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 2016, 48 (01) : 17 - 39
  • [38] Identification and analysis of adoption barriers of disruptive technologies in the logistics industry
    Rathore, Bhawana
    Gupta, Rohit
    Biswas, Baidyanath
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Gupta, Shubhi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 33 (05) : 136 - 169
  • [39] Disruptive technology roadmaps
    Kostoff, RN
    Boylan, R
    Simons, GR
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2004, 71 (1-2) : 141 - 159
  • [40] Is this technology too disruptive?
    不详
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2008, 200 (2681) : 5 - 5