Analysis of industry equilibria in models with sustaining and disruptive technology

被引:35
|
作者
Huang, Xiao
Sosic, Greys [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
Disruptive technology; Competition; Capacity; Pricing; Nash equilibrium; New product introduction; PRICE-COMPETITION; CAPACITY; PRODUCT; INVESTMENT; MARKET; POSTPONEMENT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.033
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes a special type of technology evolution, referred to in the literature as disruptive technology vs. sustaining technology. In general, "old" products based on sustaining technology are perceived to be superior to the "new" ones based on disruptive technology. However, the latter have distinctive features that allow them to attract an exclusive set of customers. Examples include notebooks vs. netbooks, hard-disk drives vs. solid-state drives, laser printers vs. inkjet printers, etc. We consider a model with an established firm and an entrant firm that have heterogeneous product-offering capabilities: the established firm can offer either or both types of products, while the entrant firm can only offer new products. Firms make capacity, pricing, and quantity decisions that maximize their ex-ante profit. Within this framework, we analyze deterministic games with perfect information and stochastic games with uncertain valuation of the disruptive technology. Equilibrium decisions are discussed under various market conditions, as well as under dedicated vs. flexible capacity assumptions. While over-investment and over-production may occur in a stochastic game with dedicated capacities, the equilibrium capacity decisions seem to be more "rational" if the established firm utilizes flexibly capacity, or if the dedicated capacity can be converted ex-post (albeit at some expense). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Understanding disruptive technology transitions in the global logistics industry: the role of ecosystems
    Mikl, Jasmin
    Herold, David M.
    Pilch, Kamila
    Cwiklicki, Marek
    Kummer, Sebastian
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND STRATEGY, 2021, 31 (01) : 62 - 79
  • [22] Promotion and Application Prospects of Disruptive Technology in Future Development of Space Industry
    SUN Zongtan
    LI Hui
    JIA Ping
    YAO Baoyin
    [J]. Aerospace China, 2016, 17 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [23] Factors differentiating the commercialization of disruptive and sustaining technologies
    Kassicieh, SK
    Walsh, ST
    Cummings, JC
    McWhorter, PJ
    Romig, AD
    Williams, WD
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2002, 49 (04) : 375 - 387
  • [24] Disruptive technology
    Kulkarni, R
    [J]. COMPUTING AND CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2006, 17 (01): : 32 - 35
  • [25] Disruptive technology
    Van Horn, R
    [J]. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2002, 83 (07) : 492 - +
  • [26] Building competitive advantage by disruptive and sustaining innovation
    Chen, Min
    Zhang, Xin-Guo
    [J]. RESEARCH ON ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION - 2007 PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, 2007, : 37 - 43
  • [27] Transoral Robotic Surgery Disruptive or Sustaining Innovation?
    Couch, Marion Everett
    Zanation, Adam
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (09) : 907 - 908
  • [28] Disruptive technology
    Dorman, Nijsje
    [J]. BIOTECHNIQUES, 2013, 54 (06) : 297 - 297
  • [29] Exploring the Disruptive Nature of Disruptive Technology
    Pilkington, Alan
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1895 - 1899
  • [30] CREATING AND SUSTAINING COMPETITIVENESS - AN ANALYSIS OF THE JAPANESE ROBOTICS INDUSTRY
    BOWONDER, B
    MIYAKE, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1994, 9 (5-7) : 575 - 611