Jurassic technology? Sustaining presumptions of intersubjectivity in a disruptive environment

被引:0
|
作者
Robert S. Jansen
机构
[1] University of California,Sociology Department
[2] Los Angeles,undefined
来源
Theory and Society | 2008年 / 37卷
关键词
Ongoing Interaction; Museum Visitor; Folk Theory; Spatial Content; Everyday Setting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While the problem of intersubjectivity has motivated a great deal of sociological research, there has been little consideration of the relationship between intersubjectivity-sustaining practices and the physical environment in which these are enacted. The Museum of Jurassic Technology (MJT) is a strategic site for exploring this relationship. With its labyrinthine layout and bewildering exhibits, the MJT provides a natural “breaching experiment” in which concrete elements of the space disrupt normal competencies for sustaining presumptions of intersubjectivity. Using ethnographic data on visitor interaction, this article specifies two disruptive aspects of the physical environment and identifies four methods of repair on which visitors rely to reestablish presumptions of intersubjectivity. The analysis of spatially situated processes of intersubjective disruption and repair in an extreme case such as the MJT is a first step toward “emplacing” the intersubjectivity problem in more everyday settings.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 159
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Jurassic technology?: Sustaining presumptions of intersubjectivity in a disruptive environment
    Jansen, Robert S.
    [J]. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 2008, 37 (02) : 127 - 159
  • [2] Analysis of industry equilibria in models with sustaining and disruptive technology
    Huang, Xiao
    Sosic, Greys
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 207 (01) : 238 - 248
  • [3] DISRUPTIVE VS. SUSTAINING TECHNOLOGY AND THE DESIGN PROCESS
    Kaldate, Amit
    Thurston, Deborah
    Rood, Mark
    [J]. ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 7: DESIGN FOR X, DESIGN TO X, 2009, : 277 - +
  • [4] An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations
    Kassicieh, SK
    Walsh, ST
    Romig, A
    Cummings, J
    McWhorter, P
    Williams, D
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE KNOWLEDGE ERA, 2001, : 109 - 116
  • [5] TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT - SUSTAINING, NOT OBLITERATING, THE ENVIRONMENT
    KAMMEN, DM
    [J]. RESEARCH & EXPLORATION, 1991, 7 (01): : 3 - 5
  • [6] The role of technology in sustaining agriculture and the environment
    Aldy, JE
    Hrubovcak, J
    Vasavada, U
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 26 (01) : 81 - 96
  • [7] The holding environment and intersubjectivity
    Ginot, E
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC QUARTERLY, 2001, 70 (02): : 417 - 446
  • [8] DISRUPTIVE AND SUSTAINING INNOVATION: DO THEY MATTER FOR TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY IN A FIRM'S PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY?
    Adewumi, Olugbenga michael
    Lien, Gudbrand
    Mydland, Orjan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (07N08)
  • [9] Disruptive vs. sustaining technologies
    Shaller, R
    [J]. EE-EVALUATION ENGINEERING, 2004, 43 (05): : 20 - +
  • [10] Roadmapping: from sustaining to disruptive technologies
    Linton, JD
    Walsh, ST
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2004, 71 (1-2) : 1 - 3