Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics-A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System

被引:19
|
作者
van den Noort, Josien C. [1 ,3 ]
Kortier, Henk G. [1 ]
van Beek, Nathalie [2 ]
Veeger, DirkJan H. E. J. [2 ]
Veltink, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, MIRA Res Inst Biomed Technol & Tech Med, Biomed Signals & Syst Grp, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, MOVE Res Inst Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, MOVE Res Inst Amsterdam, Dept Rehabil Med, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
MAGNETIC SENSORS; INDEX FINGER; GLOVE; THUMB; DEFINITIONS; MOVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0164889
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective analysis of hand and finger kinematics is important to increase understanding of hand function and to quantify motor symptoms for clinical diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to compare a new 3D measurement system containing multiple miniature inertial sensors (PowerGlove) with an opto-electronic marker system during specific finger tasks in three healthy subjects. Various finger movements tasks were performed: flexion, fast flexion, tapping, hand open/closing, ab/adduction and circular pointing. 3D joint angles of the index finger joints and position of the thumb and index were compared between systems. Median root mean square differences of the main joint angles of interest ranged between 3.3 and 8.4deg. Largest differences were found in fast and circular pointing tasks, mainly in range of motion. Smallest differences for all 3D joint angles were observed in the flexion tasks. For fast finger tapping, the thumb/index amplitude showed a median difference of 15.8mm. Differences could be explained by skin movement artifacts caused by relative marker movements of the marker system, particularly during fast tasks; large movement accelerations and angular velocities which exceeded the range of the inertial sensors; and by differences in segment calibrations between systems. The PowerGlove is a system that can be of value to measure 3D hand and finger kinematics and positions in an ambulatory setting. The reported differences need to be taken into account when applying the system in studies understanding the hand function and quantifying hand motor symptoms in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D HAND GESTURE INTERACTION FOR AUGMENTED REALITY APPLICATIONS
    Radkowski, Rafael
    Stritzke, Christian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 2, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 1533 - 1543
  • [32] Comparison between Theia3D markerless and CAST model marker-based systems in pathological lower-body 3D gait kinematics in adults and children
    D'Souza, Sonia
    Fohanno, Vincent
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2023, 100 : 40 - 41
  • [33] CORRELATION BETWEEN 3D KNEE KINEMATICS AND TIBIO FEMORAL RADIOGRAPHIC OSTEOARTHRITIS GRADING SYSTEM
    Blouin, J.
    Mezghani, N.
    Cooke, T. D.
    Brean, M.
    Fuentes, A.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2014, 22 : S96 - S97
  • [34] A comparison of 3D scapular kinematics between dominant and nondominant shoulders during multiplanar arm motion
    Sang Ki Lee
    Dae Suk Yang
    Ha Yong Kim
    Won Sik Choy
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2013, 47 : 135 - 142
  • [35] A comparison of 3D scapular kinematics between dominant and nondominant shoulders during multiplanar arm motion
    Lee, Sang Ki
    Yang, Dae Suk
    Kim, Ha Yong
    Choy, Won Sik
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 47 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [36] 3D spinal motion analysis during staircase walking using an ambulatory inertial and magnetic sensing system
    Lee, Jung Keun
    Park, Edward J.
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2011, 49 (07) : 755 - 764
  • [37] 3D spinal motion analysis during staircase walking using an ambulatory inertial and magnetic sensing system
    Jung Keun Lee
    Edward J. Park
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2011, 49 : 755 - 764
  • [38] Gait analysis comparison between manual marking, 2D pose estimation algorithms, and 3D marker-based system
    Menychtas, Dimitrios
    Petrou, Nikolaos
    Kansizoglou, Ioannis
    Giannakou, Erasmia
    Grekidis, Athanasios
    Gasteratos, Antonios
    Gourgoulis, Vassilios
    Douda, Eleni
    Smilios, Ilias
    Michalopoulou, Maria
    Sirakoulis, Georgios Ch.
    Aggelousis, Nikolaos
    FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2023, 4
  • [39] Three-dimensional imaging of the forearm and hand: A comparison between two 3D imaging systems
    van Ginkel, Laura
    Dupuis, Lotte
    Verhamme, Luc
    Hermans, Erik
    Maal, Thomas J. J.
    Stirler, Vincent
    PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 3 (04):
  • [40] A Robust Biometric Authentication System for Handheld Electronic Devices by Intelligently Combining 3D Finger Motions and Cerebral Responses
    Behera, Santosh K.
    Kumar, Pradeep
    Dogra, Debi P.
    Roy, Partha P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2021, 67 (01) : 58 - 67