Three-dimensional imaging of the forearm and hand: A comparison between two 3D imaging systems

被引:0
|
作者
van Ginkel, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Dupuis, Lotte [1 ]
Verhamme, Luc [3 ]
Hermans, Erik [1 ]
Maal, Thomas J. J. [3 ]
Stirler, Vincent [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Trauma Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Tech Med, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Radboudumc 3D Lab, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000458
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The conventional treatment for distal radius fractures typically involves immobilization of the injured extremity using a conventional forearm cast. These casts do cause all sorts of discomfort during wear and impose life-style restrictions on the wearer. Personalized 3D printed splints, designed using three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems, might overcome these problems. To obtain a patient specific splint, commercially available 3D camera systems are utilized to capture patient extremities, generating 3D models for splint design. This study investigates the feasibility of utilizing a new camera system (SPENTYS) to capture 3D surface scans of the forearm for the design of 3D printed splints. In a prospective observational cohort study involving 17 healthy participants, we conducted repeated 3D imaging using both the new (SPENTYS) and a reference system (3dMD) to assess intersystem accuracy and repeatability. The intersystem accuracy of the SPENTYS system was determined by comparison of the 3D surface scans with the reference system (3dMD). Comparison of consecutive images acquired per device determined the repeatability. Feasibility was measured with system usability score questionnaires distributed among professionals. The mean absolute difference between the two systems was 0.44 mm (SD:0.25). The mean absolute difference of the repeatability of the reference -and the SPENTYS system was respectively 0.40 mm (SD: 0.30) and 0.53 mm (SD: 0.25). Both repeatability and intersystem differences were within the self-reported 1 mm. The workflow was considered easy and effective, emphasizing the potential of this approach within a workflow to obtain patient specific splint.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Chest Wall: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Systems
    Daemen, Jean H. T.
    Loonen, Tom G. J.
    Verhulst, Arico C.
    Maal, Thomas J. J.
    Maessen, Jos G.
    Vissers, Yvonne L. J.
    Hulsewe, Karel W. E.
    de Loos, Erik R.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 259 : 332 - 341
  • [2] Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging of carotid web
    Binyang Gao
    Yan Luo
    Chenyun Zhou
    Mei Zhang
    Xiaorong Wen
    Acta Neurologica Belgica, 2023, 123 : 1159 - 1160
  • [3] Three-dimensional (3D) Reconstruction of Range Gated Imaging
    Chua, Sing Yee
    Chew, Kuew Wai
    Guo, Ningqun
    Wang, Xin
    2018 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHOTONICS (ICP), 2018,
  • [4] Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging of carotid web
    Gao, Binyang
    Luo, Yan
    Zhou, Chenyun
    Zhang, Mei
    Wen, Xiaorong
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 2023, 123 (03) : 1159 - 1160
  • [5] Three-dimensional (3D) imaging: from sectional image to 3D model
    Barish, MA
    MEDICAL IMAGING IN GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 124 : 94 - 106
  • [6] Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Face: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Modalities
    Verhulst, Arico
    Hol, Marinka
    Vreeken, Rinaldo
    Becking, Alfred
    Ulrich, Dietmar
    Maal, Thomas
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (06) : 579 - 585
  • [7] Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems
    Tzou, Chieh-Han John
    Artner, Nicole M.
    Pona, Igor
    Hold, Alina
    Placheta, Eva
    Kropatsch, Walter G.
    Frey, Manfred
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (04): : 489 - 497
  • [8] Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging
    Knoops, Paul G. M.
    Beaumont, Caroline A. A.
    Borghi, Alessandro
    Rodriguez-Florez, Naiara
    Breakey, Richard W. F.
    Rodgers, William
    Angullia, Freida
    Jeelani, N. U. Owase
    Schievano, Silvia
    Dunaway, David J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (04): : 441 - 449
  • [9] Three-dimensional (3D) moment imaging with a USB3 oscilloscope
    Ranathunga, Yasashri
    Olowolafe, Temitayo
    Lee, Suk Kyoung
    Li, Wen
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2023, 94 (06):
  • [10] Commentary on: Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Face: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Modalities
    Sawh-Martinez, Rajendra
    Steinbacher, Derek M.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (06) : 586 - 589