Three-dimensional imaging of the forearm and hand: A comparison between two 3D imaging systems

被引:0
|
作者
van Ginkel, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Dupuis, Lotte [1 ]
Verhamme, Luc [3 ]
Hermans, Erik [1 ]
Maal, Thomas J. J. [3 ]
Stirler, Vincent [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Trauma Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Tech Med, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Radboudumc 3D Lab, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000458
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The conventional treatment for distal radius fractures typically involves immobilization of the injured extremity using a conventional forearm cast. These casts do cause all sorts of discomfort during wear and impose life-style restrictions on the wearer. Personalized 3D printed splints, designed using three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems, might overcome these problems. To obtain a patient specific splint, commercially available 3D camera systems are utilized to capture patient extremities, generating 3D models for splint design. This study investigates the feasibility of utilizing a new camera system (SPENTYS) to capture 3D surface scans of the forearm for the design of 3D printed splints. In a prospective observational cohort study involving 17 healthy participants, we conducted repeated 3D imaging using both the new (SPENTYS) and a reference system (3dMD) to assess intersystem accuracy and repeatability. The intersystem accuracy of the SPENTYS system was determined by comparison of the 3D surface scans with the reference system (3dMD). Comparison of consecutive images acquired per device determined the repeatability. Feasibility was measured with system usability score questionnaires distributed among professionals. The mean absolute difference between the two systems was 0.44 mm (SD:0.25). The mean absolute difference of the repeatability of the reference -and the SPENTYS system was respectively 0.40 mm (SD: 0.30) and 0.53 mm (SD: 0.25). Both repeatability and intersystem differences were within the self-reported 1 mm. The workflow was considered easy and effective, emphasizing the potential of this approach within a workflow to obtain patient specific splint.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera
    Kong, Seong-Ho
    Oh, Byung-Mo
    Yoon, Hongman
    Ahn, Hye Seong
    Lee, Hyuk-Joon
    Chung, Sun Geun
    Shiraishi, Norio
    Kitano, Seigo
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (05): : 1132 - 1143
  • [42] Three-dimensional MR imaging phantom generator and MR imaging simulator for processing and analyzing virtual 3D MR images
    Johnson, RF
    Rose, GH
    Longwell, JW
    Brunder, DC
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 800 - 800
  • [43] Comparison between three-dimensional and triplanar computed tomography imaging of the frontal recess
    Isaacs, Seth J.
    Goyal, Parul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2009, 23 (05) : 502 - 505
  • [44] Comparison of plaster casting with three-dimensional cranial imaging
    Littlefield, TR
    Cherney, JC
    Luisi, JN
    Beals, SP
    Kelly, KM
    Pomatto, JK
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (02): : 157 - 164
  • [45] Frontiers in Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging Systems for 3D Face Acquisition in Craniofacial Research and Practice: An Updated Literature Review
    Singh, Pradeep
    Bornstein, Michael M.
    Hsung, Richard Tai-Chiu
    Ajmera, Deepal Haresh
    Leung, Yiu Yan
    Gu, Min
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [46] Comparison of one-dimensional (1D) and three-dimensional (3D) models for the estimation of coronary fractional flow reserve through cardiovascular imaging
    Bezerra, Cristiano
    Lemos, Pedro A.
    Pinton, Fabio A.
    Mueller, Lucas
    Bulant, Carlos
    Talou, Gonzalo Maso
    Feijoo, Raul A.
    Filh Esteves, Antonio Esteves
    Blanco, Pablo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B248 - B248
  • [47] Image Quality and Dose Comparison of 3 Mobile Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems in Spine Surgery
    Foster, Norah
    Shaffrey, Christopher
    Buchholz, Avery
    Turner, Raymond
    Yang, Lexie Zidanyue
    Niedzwiecki, Donna
    Goode, Allen
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 160 : E142 - E151
  • [48] Three dimensional (3D) imaging techniques in orthodontics-An update
    Alshammery, Fahad Abdullah
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2020, 9 (06) : 2626 - 2630
  • [49] Three Dimensional (3D) Body Imaging for Assessment of Body Volume
    Freeland-Graves, Jeanne H.
    Xu, Bugao
    Pepper, M. Reese
    Dai, Zhaoli
    Yu, Wurong
    Cahill, Jodi M.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22
  • [50] Innovative Integration and Future Prospects of Three-Dimensional Imaging Reconstruction and 3D Printing in Plastic Surgery
    Xie, Cheng
    Hong, Xin
    Huang, Xiongfeng
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024,