Classification and Printability of EUV Mask Defects from SEM images

被引:2
|
作者
Cho, Wonil [1 ]
Price, Daniel [1 ]
Morgan, Paul A. [1 ]
Rost, Daniel [1 ]
Satake, Masaki [2 ]
Tolani, Vikram L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Micron Technol Inc, Mask Technol Ctr, 8000 S Fed Way, Boise, ID 83716 USA
[2] KLA Tencor Corp, One Technol Dr, Milpitas, CA 95035 USA
关键词
EUV mask inspection; mask defects; ADC; Automatic Defect Classification; defect SEM review; mask SEM; reticle SEM; SEM ADC; Aerial Image Analyzer; AIA; Reticle Decision Center; RDC;
D O I
10.1117/12.2280837
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
EUV lithography is starting to show more promise for patterning some of the critical layers at the 5nm technology node and beyond. However, there still are many technical challenges to overcome before it can be implemented into high volume manufacturing (HVM) and one of them is the production of defect-free EUV masks. Mask shops today typically use their cutting-edge 193nm inspection tools to detect defects on patterned EUV masks, since no EUV actinic pattern inspection or even e-beam mask inspection tools are available. The 193nm inspection tools have limited resolution on mask dimensions targeted for EUV patterning. The theoretical resolution limit for 193nm mask inspection tools is about 60nm HP on 4X masks, which means that main feature sizes on EUV masks will be well beyond the practical resolution of 193nm inspection tools. Nevertheless, 193nm inspection tools with various illumination conditions to maximize defect sensitivity and/or main-pattern modulation are being explored for initial EUV defect detection. Due to the generally low signal-to-noise in 193nm inspection imaging of EUV masks, these inspections often need to be run "hot" resulting in hundreds or thousands of defects getting detected. Each one of these detections then need to be accurately reviewed and dispositioned. Manually reviewing each defect is difficult due to poor 193nm resolution. In addition, the lack of a reliable aerial image dispositioning system makes it even more challenging to disposition for printability. In this paper, we present the use of SEM images of EUV masks for higher resolution review and disposition of defects. In this approach, most of the defects detected by the 193nm inspection tools are first imaged on a mask SEM tool. These images together with the corresponding post-OPC design clips are provided to KLA-Tencor's Reticle Decision Center (RDC) platform which provides a comprehensive SEM ADC (Automatic Defect Classification) analysis of every defect. First, a defect-free or reference mask SEM image is rendered from the post-OPC design, and the defective signature is determined from the difference image. The defective signatures help assess the true nature of the defect as seen under e-beam imaging; for example, excess or missing EUV absorber, line-edge roughness, contamination, etc. Next, the defect and reference contours are extracted from the grayscale SEM images and fed into the simulation engine with an EUV mask and scanner model to generate corresponding EUV defect and reference aerial images. These are then analyzed for printability and dispositioned using RDC's Aerial Image Analyzer application to automatically measure and estimate the impact of the mask defect to wafer CDs. By integrating the SEM ADC application into the EUV inspection and review flow this way, every defect is characterized for its type and printability. Such defect characterization is essential not only for determining which defects are nuisance or critical, but also for monitoring the performance of EUV mask process tools. With EUV lithography progressing towards volume manufacturing and progress being made in the area of e-beam based mask inspectors, the EUV SEM ADC software solution will continue serving an essential role of dispositioning defects off e-beam imaging.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Defects printability and specification of ArF mask in repeating feature
    Kim, WH
    Ma, WK
    Kim, HB
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XV, PTS 1 AND 2, 2002, 4691 : 1357 - 1365
  • [32] Repairing native defects on EUV mask blanks
    Lawliss, Mark
    Gallagher, Emily
    Hibbs, Michael
    Seki, Kazunori
    Isogawa, Takeshi
    Robinson, Tod
    LeClaire, Jeff
    PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2014, 2014, 9235
  • [33] Origin of EUV mask blank defects from ion beam deposition
    Yu, H.
    Andruczyk, D.
    Ruzic, D. N.
    Jindal, V.
    Kearney, P.
    Jiang, Y.
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY III, 2012, 8322
  • [34] Study of Real Defects on EUV Blanks and a Strategy for EUV Mask Inspection
    Huh, Sungmin
    Rastegar, Abbas
    Wurm, Stefan
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Mochi, Iacopo
    Nakajima, Toshio
    Kishimoto, Masahiro
    Komakine, Mitsuhiko
    26TH EUROPEAN MASK AND LITHOGRAPHY CONFERENCE, 2010, 7545
  • [35] Effects of mask absorber thickness on printability in EUV lithography with high resolution resist
    Kamo, Takashi
    Aoyama, Hajime
    Tanaka, Toshihiko
    Suga, Osamu
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XV, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 7028
  • [36] Pattern printability for reflectance degradation of Mo/Si mask blanks in EUV lithography
    Sugawara, M., 1600, PMJ-Photomask Japan; BACUS-intl. technical group of SPIE; SPIE (SPIE):
  • [37] Pattern printability for reflectance degradation of Mo/Si mask blanks in EUV lithography
    Sugawara, M
    Ito, M
    Chiba, A
    Hoshino, E
    Yamanashi, H
    Hoko, H
    Ogawa, T
    Lee, BT
    Yoneda, T
    Takahashi, M
    Nishiyama, I
    Okazaki, S
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY IX, 2002, 4754 : 880 - 889
  • [38] Printability and Actinic AIMS™ Review of Programmed Mask Blank Defects
    Verduijn, Erik
    Mangat, Pawitter
    Wood, Obert
    Rankin, Jed
    Chen, Yulu
    Goodwin, Francis
    Capelli, Renzo
    Perlitz, Sascha
    Hellweg, Dirk
    Bonam, Ravi
    Matham, Shravan
    Felix, Nelson
    Corliss, Daniel
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY VIII, 2017, 10143
  • [39] Printability of Buried Mask Defects in Extreme-UV Lithography
    Hsu, Pei-Cheng
    Yao, Ming-Jiun
    Hsueh, Wen-Chang
    Chen, Chia-Jen
    Lee, Shin-Chang
    Yu, Ching-Fang
    Hsu, Luke
    Chin, Sheng-Ji
    Hu, Jimmy
    Chang, Shu-Hao
    Shih, Chih-T'sung
    Lu, Yen-Cheng
    Wu, Timothy
    Yu, Shinn-Sheng
    Yen, Anthony
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY II, 2011, 7969
  • [40] EUV mask preparation considering blank defects mitigation
    Du, Yuelin
    Zhang, Hongbo
    Wong, Martin D. F.
    Topaloglu, Rasit O.
    PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2011, 2011, 8166