Classification and Printability of EUV Mask Defects from SEM images

被引:2
|
作者
Cho, Wonil [1 ]
Price, Daniel [1 ]
Morgan, Paul A. [1 ]
Rost, Daniel [1 ]
Satake, Masaki [2 ]
Tolani, Vikram L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Micron Technol Inc, Mask Technol Ctr, 8000 S Fed Way, Boise, ID 83716 USA
[2] KLA Tencor Corp, One Technol Dr, Milpitas, CA 95035 USA
关键词
EUV mask inspection; mask defects; ADC; Automatic Defect Classification; defect SEM review; mask SEM; reticle SEM; SEM ADC; Aerial Image Analyzer; AIA; Reticle Decision Center; RDC;
D O I
10.1117/12.2280837
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
EUV lithography is starting to show more promise for patterning some of the critical layers at the 5nm technology node and beyond. However, there still are many technical challenges to overcome before it can be implemented into high volume manufacturing (HVM) and one of them is the production of defect-free EUV masks. Mask shops today typically use their cutting-edge 193nm inspection tools to detect defects on patterned EUV masks, since no EUV actinic pattern inspection or even e-beam mask inspection tools are available. The 193nm inspection tools have limited resolution on mask dimensions targeted for EUV patterning. The theoretical resolution limit for 193nm mask inspection tools is about 60nm HP on 4X masks, which means that main feature sizes on EUV masks will be well beyond the practical resolution of 193nm inspection tools. Nevertheless, 193nm inspection tools with various illumination conditions to maximize defect sensitivity and/or main-pattern modulation are being explored for initial EUV defect detection. Due to the generally low signal-to-noise in 193nm inspection imaging of EUV masks, these inspections often need to be run "hot" resulting in hundreds or thousands of defects getting detected. Each one of these detections then need to be accurately reviewed and dispositioned. Manually reviewing each defect is difficult due to poor 193nm resolution. In addition, the lack of a reliable aerial image dispositioning system makes it even more challenging to disposition for printability. In this paper, we present the use of SEM images of EUV masks for higher resolution review and disposition of defects. In this approach, most of the defects detected by the 193nm inspection tools are first imaged on a mask SEM tool. These images together with the corresponding post-OPC design clips are provided to KLA-Tencor's Reticle Decision Center (RDC) platform which provides a comprehensive SEM ADC (Automatic Defect Classification) analysis of every defect. First, a defect-free or reference mask SEM image is rendered from the post-OPC design, and the defective signature is determined from the difference image. The defective signatures help assess the true nature of the defect as seen under e-beam imaging; for example, excess or missing EUV absorber, line-edge roughness, contamination, etc. Next, the defect and reference contours are extracted from the grayscale SEM images and fed into the simulation engine with an EUV mask and scanner model to generate corresponding EUV defect and reference aerial images. These are then analyzed for printability and dispositioned using RDC's Aerial Image Analyzer application to automatically measure and estimate the impact of the mask defect to wafer CDs. By integrating the SEM ADC application into the EUV inspection and review flow this way, every defect is characterized for its type and printability. Such defect characterization is essential not only for determining which defects are nuisance or critical, but also for monitoring the performance of EUV mask process tools. With EUV lithography progressing towards volume manufacturing and progress being made in the area of e-beam based mask inspectors, the EUV SEM ADC software solution will continue serving an essential role of dispositioning defects off e-beam imaging.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulation study of pattern printability for reflective mask in EUV lithography
    Sugawara, M
    Chiba, A
    Nishiyama, I
    19TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MASK TECHNOLOGY FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND MICROCOMPONENTS, 2003, 5148 : 225 - 234
  • [22] New method of detection and classification of yield-impacting EUV mask defects
    Graur, Ioana
    Vengertsev, Dmitry
    Raghunathan, Ananthan
    Stobert, Ian
    Rankin, Jed
    PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2015, 2015, 9635
  • [23] Phase measurements of EUV mask defects
    Claus, Rene A.
    Wang, Yow-Gwo
    Wojdyla, Antoine
    Benk, Markus P.
    Goldberg, Kenneth A.
    Neureuther, Andrew R.
    Naulleau, Patrick P.
    Waller, Laura
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY VI, 2015, 9422
  • [24] Simulation of light scatter from defects in EUV mask blanks
    Ito, M
    Ogawa, T
    Nishiyama, I
    Okazaki, S
    MICROPROCESSES AND NANOTECHNOLOGY 2001, DIGEST OF PAPERS, 2001, : 86 - 87
  • [25] Mask 3D effect reduction and defect printability of etched multilayer EUV mask
    Kamo, Takashi
    Yamane, Takeshi
    Morikawa, Yasutaka
    Iida, Susumu
    Uchiyama, Takayuki
    Magoshi, Shunko
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY X, 2019, 10957
  • [26] Simulation analysis of printability of scratch and bump defects in EUV lithography
    Sugawara, Minoru
    Nishiyama, Iwao
    EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES X, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6151
  • [27] Defect printability modeling of smoothed substrate defects for EUV lithography
    Ray-Chaudhuri, AK
    Fisher, AC
    Gullikson, EM
    20TH ANNUAL BACUS SYMPOSIUM ON PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 4186 : 781 - 786
  • [28] Printability and inspectability of programmed pit defects on the masks in EUV lithography
    Kang, In-Yong
    Seo, Hwan-Seok
    Ahn, Byung-Sup
    Lee, Dong-Gun
    Kim, Dongwan
    Huh, Sungmin
    Koh, Cha-Won
    Cha, Brian
    Kim, Seong-Sue
    Cho, Han-Ku
    Mochi, Iacopo
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY, 2010, 7636
  • [29] Printability of programmed x-ray mask defects
    Watanabe, H
    Yabe, H
    Kikuchi, Y
    Marumoto, K
    Matsui, Y
    PHOTOMASK AND X-RAY MASK TECHNOLOGY VI, 1999, 3748 : 479 - 485
  • [30] PRINTABILITY OF MASK DEFECTS IN NEGATIVE RESIST PROJECTION PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY
    RAMAMURTHY, S
    KUMAR, R
    SINGH, DN
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1988, 28 (03): : 345 - 351