Further studies in the reduction of residual in Harshaw TLD-100H (LiF:Mg,Cu,P)

被引:0
|
作者
Ramlo, M. [1 ]
Moscovitch, M. [2 ]
Rotunda, J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thermo Fisher Scientif, Oakland Village, OH USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Med, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncl115
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper describes further investigations and results in the reduction of residual signal in Harshaw TLD-100H, 600H and 700H (LiF:Mg,Cu,P). TLD-100H is an advanced, relatively new dosimetric material with near tissue-equivalence, flat energy response, and the ability to measure beta, photon and, more importantly, neutrons all from the same base material. The simple glow curve structure provides insignificant fade over extended dosimetric periods of up to 1 y. A criticism of the material has been the residual as compared with TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti). We will show how high-temperature peaks cause the residual signal. We will also show how the various parameters and conditions of the residual measurement technique as well as the configuration of the sample affect the residual measurements. A brief description of the experimental paths taken during our investigation will be presented. We will show how we have reduced the high-temperature peaks of LiF:Mg,Cu,P in our manufacturing process while not affecting other dosimetric properties of this material. The improvements and material properties that need to be shown have been incorporated into our production processes. LiF:Mg,Cu,P stands as a premier choice for personal dosimetry and has been integrated into personal, environmental and extremity configurations of the Harshaw TLD family-line of products.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 219
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of neutron irradiation on dosimetric properties of TLD-600H (6LiF:Mg,Cu,P)
    Romanyukha, A.
    Minniti, R.
    Moscovitch, M.
    Thompson, A. K.
    Trompier, F.
    Colle, R.
    Sucheta, A.
    Voss, S. P.
    Benevides, L. A.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2011, 46 (12) : 1426 - 1431
  • [22] Effect of TLD-700H (LiF: Mg, Cu, P) sensitivity loss at multiple read-irradiation cycles on TLD reader calibration
    Voss, Shannon P.
    Sucheta, Artur
    Romanyukha, Alex
    Moscovitch, Marco
    Kennemur, Lisa K.
    Benevides, Luis A.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2011, 46 (12) : 1590 - 1594
  • [23] Comparative studies of glow peaks and kinetic trapping parameters of LiF(Mg,Cu), LiF(Mg,Cu,P), LiF(Mg,Cu,Si) and LiF(Mg,Cu,Na,Si) single crystals
    Laopaiboon, R.
    Bootjomchai, C.
    Pencharee, S.
    Laopaiboon, J.
    RADIATION EFFECTS AND DEFECTS IN SOLIDS, 2014, 169 (02): : 129 - 136
  • [24] Optical absorption and thermoluminescence studies in irradiated dosimetric LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100)
    Oster, L
    Horowitz, YS
    Issa, N
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1999, 84 (1-4) : 17 - 20
  • [25] An improved LiF:Mg,Cu,P chip with a low residual signal
    Tang, K
    Cai, G
    Shen, W
    Min, L
    Zhu, H
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1999, 84 (1-4) : 227 - 229
  • [26] EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE HARSHAW™ DXTRAD LiF:Mg,Cu,P FINGER RING WITH TWO DIFFERENT THICKNESS FILTERS
    Baker, S. T.
    Roberts, G. H.
    Gilvin, P. J.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2011, 144 (1-4) : 243 - 245
  • [27] Long-term neutron dose fading study of LiF: Mg,Cu,P TLD
    Delzer, J. A.
    Romanyukha, A.
    Benevides, L. A.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2011, 46 (02) : 199 - 204
  • [28] ANOMALOUS THERMALLY INDUCED FADING OF ANNEALED AND UNANNEALED LIF-MG, TI (TLD-100, HARSHAW) USING COMPUTERIZED GLOW CURVE DECONVOLUTION
    SHACHAR, BB
    HOROWITZ, YS
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1991, 24 (09) : 1649 - 1657
  • [29] Further studies on the role of dopants in LiF:Mg,Cu,Si thermoluminescent material
    Tang, K.
    Fan, H.
    Cui, H.
    Zhu, H.
    Liu, Z.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2015, 163 (03) : 288 - 291
  • [30] LONG-TERM FADE STUDY OF THE DT-702 LiF: Mg,Cu,P TLD
    Delzer, J. A.
    Hawley, J. R.
    Romanyukha, A.
    Nemmers, S.
    Selwyn, R.
    Benevides, L. A.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 131 (03) : 279 - 286