Further studies in the reduction of residual in Harshaw TLD-100H (LiF:Mg,Cu,P)

被引:0
|
作者
Ramlo, M. [1 ]
Moscovitch, M. [2 ]
Rotunda, J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thermo Fisher Scientif, Oakland Village, OH USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Med, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncl115
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper describes further investigations and results in the reduction of residual signal in Harshaw TLD-100H, 600H and 700H (LiF:Mg,Cu,P). TLD-100H is an advanced, relatively new dosimetric material with near tissue-equivalence, flat energy response, and the ability to measure beta, photon and, more importantly, neutrons all from the same base material. The simple glow curve structure provides insignificant fade over extended dosimetric periods of up to 1 y. A criticism of the material has been the residual as compared with TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti). We will show how high-temperature peaks cause the residual signal. We will also show how the various parameters and conditions of the residual measurement technique as well as the configuration of the sample affect the residual measurements. A brief description of the experimental paths taken during our investigation will be presented. We will show how we have reduced the high-temperature peaks of LiF:Mg,Cu,P in our manufacturing process while not affecting other dosimetric properties of this material. The improvements and material properties that need to be shown have been incorporated into our production processes. LiF:Mg,Cu,P stands as a premier choice for personal dosimetry and has been integrated into personal, environmental and extremity configurations of the Harshaw TLD family-line of products.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 219
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of LiF:Mg, Cu (TLD-100H) Dosimeters for in Diagnostic Radiology
    Sina, S.
    Zeinali, B.
    Karinnipourfard, M.
    Lotfalizadeh, F.
    Sadeghi, M.
    Faghihi, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 131 - 131
  • [2] A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry
    Al-Haj, Abdalla
    Lagarde, Charlie
    Mahyoub, Fareed
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2007, 125 (1-4) : 399 - 402
  • [3] Performance of Harshaw TLD-100H two-element dosemeter
    Luo, L. Z.
    Rotunda, J. E.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2006, 120 (1-4) : 324 - 330
  • [4] Comparison of LiF (TLD-100 and TLD-100H) detectors for extremity monitoring
    Freire, L.
    Calado, A.
    Cardoso, J. V.
    Santos, L. M.
    Alves, J. G.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2008, 43 (2-6) : 646 - 650
  • [5] UV-INDUCED BLEACHING OF DEEP TRAPS IN HARSHAW TLD LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti
    Benevides, L.
    Voss, S.
    Nita, I.
    Rotunda, J.
    Velbeck, K.
    Luo, L. Z.
    Moscovitch, M.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2011, 144 (1-4) : 199 - 201
  • [6] TYPE TESTING OF LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETERS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF Hp(10) AND Hp(0.07)
    Pereira, J. S.
    Pereira, M. F.
    Rangel, S.
    Caldeira, M.
    Carvalhal, G.
    Santos, L. M.
    Cardoso, J. V.
    Alves, J. G.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2019, 184 (02) : 216 - 223
  • [7] Comparison of time effects, decision limit and residual signal in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P
    Gilvin, P. J.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2007, 125 (1-4) : 233 - 236
  • [8] A comparative analysis of three thermoluminescent phosphors LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100), LiF:Mg,Cu and LiF:Mg,Cu,P
    Srivastava, JK
    Bhatt, BC
    Yoshimura, EM
    Okuno, E
    Sunta, CM
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1996, 65 (1-4) : 191 - 194
  • [9] Anomalous behavior of LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD100H) irradiated with electron beams
    Triolo, A.
    Brai, M.
    Bartolotta, A.
    Marrale, M.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2006, 568 (02): : 784 - 791
  • [10] Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P
    Baker, S. T.
    Gilvin, P. J.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2007, 125 (1-4) : 258 - 260