An internal distraction device for Le Fort distraction osteogenesis: The NAVID system

被引:8
|
作者
Nakajima, Hideo [1 ]
Sakamoto, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Tamada, Ikkei [2 ]
Ohara, Hirotoshi [3 ]
Kishi, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Shinjuku Ward, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Childrens Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Fuchu, Tokyo 1838561, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Saitama Natl Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Wako, Saitama 3510102, Japan
关键词
Crouzon syndrome; Apert syndrome; Cleft lip; Midface hypoplasia; Le Fort; Distraction osteogenesis; Internal distraction device; RIGID EXTERNAL DISTRACTION; MAXILLARY DISTRACTION; CLEFT-LIP; OSTEOTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; ADVANCEMENT; RELAPSE; PALATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Le Fort distraction osteogenesis is sometimes applied to improve the facial appearance in craniofacial dysostosis or cleft lip and palate. Distraction devices are generally classified into external and internal types. The movement of external distractors can be controlled easily but their large size and the need for a facial mask cause much psychological stress to the patient. Internal distractors are smaller and better tolerated, but they are not easily controllable and removal is difficult. We designed an internal distraction device to eliminate the problems of the currently available distractors -Nakajima's angle-variable internal distraction (NAVID) system - and aimed to assess its clinical applicability. Between 2000 and 2010, we treated 16 patients with the NAVID system: Le Fort I, III, III + I and IV distractions were performed in three, five, four and four patients, respectively. Distraction was started after a 1-week latency period. Then, the exposed rod was cut, and the distractors were left in place for 3 months or more as retention devices, and thereafter removed. All patients showed satisfactory occlusion and facial aesthetics. Open bite during the consolidation period was the main complication. In conclusion, the NAVID system is safe, effective and reliable for all types of Le Fort distraction osteogenesis. (C) 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis of midface-retrusion in a case of Hajdu Cheny syndrome
    Satoh, K
    Tsutsumi, K
    Tosa, Y
    Mikawa, M
    Hosaka, Y
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 13 (02) : 298 - 302
  • [42] Simultaneous 3-Dimensional Le Fort I/Distraction Osteogenesis Technique: Positional Changes
    Pinto, Lecio P.
    Bell, William H.
    Chu, Stephen
    Buschang, Peter H.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [43] Le Fort III in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Cost Comparison of Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Single-Stage Internal Fixation Techniques
    Mosa, Adam J.
    Zellner, Elizabeth
    Ho, Emily S.
    Fisher, Mark D.
    Phillips, John H.
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [44] Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Conventional Le Fort III Osteotomy in Correction of Syndromic Midfacial Hypoplasia: A Systematic Review
    Saltaji, Humam
    Altalibi, Mostafa
    Major, Michael P.
    Al-Nuaimi, Muhammed H.
    Tabbaa, Sawsan
    Major, Paul W.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (05) : 959 - 972
  • [45] Cat's cradle midfacial fixation in distraction osteogenesis after Le Fort III osteotomy
    Havlik, RJ
    Seelinger, MJ
    Fashemo, DV
    Hathaway, R
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 15 (06) : 946 - 952
  • [46] Craniofacial Stability in Patients With Crouzon or Apert Syndrome After Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis
    Reitsma, Jacobus H.
    Ongkosuwito, Edwin M.
    Buschang, Peter H.
    Adrichem, Leon N. A. v
    Prahl-Andersen, Birte
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2013, 50 (05): : 561 - 569
  • [47] Combined Orthognathic Distraction Procedure: Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy and Mandibular Curvilinear Distraction Osteogenesis. A New Technique for Craniofacial Management
    Schendel, Stephen A.
    Hazan-Molina, Hagai
    Aizenbud, Dror
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (04) : 874 - 877
  • [48] Monobloc Frontofacial or Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Treatment Outcome and the Need for Central Distraction
    Hu, Ching-Hsuan
    Wu, Chieh-Tsai
    Ko, Ellen Wen-Ching
    Chen, Philip Kuo-Ting
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (05) : 1344 - 1349
  • [49] Transsutural Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Osteotemy Distraction Osteogenesis
    Liu, Chen
    Liu, Chunming
    Gao, Quanwen
    Hou, Min
    Li, Guizhen
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (02) : 464 - 471
  • [50] Quantitative Results of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Pierre Robin Infants Using a Vertical Ramus Osteotomy and Internal Distraction Device
    Fairbanks, G.
    Varkarakis, G.
    Scherer, A.
    Havlik, R. J.
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 13: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEEN CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY AND PARIS DISTRACTION SYMPOSIUM, 2009, : 99 - 104