An internal distraction device for Le Fort distraction osteogenesis: The NAVID system

被引:8
|
作者
Nakajima, Hideo [1 ]
Sakamoto, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Tamada, Ikkei [2 ]
Ohara, Hirotoshi [3 ]
Kishi, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Shinjuku Ward, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Childrens Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Fuchu, Tokyo 1838561, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Saitama Natl Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Wako, Saitama 3510102, Japan
关键词
Crouzon syndrome; Apert syndrome; Cleft lip; Midface hypoplasia; Le Fort; Distraction osteogenesis; Internal distraction device; RIGID EXTERNAL DISTRACTION; MAXILLARY DISTRACTION; CLEFT-LIP; OSTEOTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; ADVANCEMENT; RELAPSE; PALATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Le Fort distraction osteogenesis is sometimes applied to improve the facial appearance in craniofacial dysostosis or cleft lip and palate. Distraction devices are generally classified into external and internal types. The movement of external distractors can be controlled easily but their large size and the need for a facial mask cause much psychological stress to the patient. Internal distractors are smaller and better tolerated, but they are not easily controllable and removal is difficult. We designed an internal distraction device to eliminate the problems of the currently available distractors -Nakajima's angle-variable internal distraction (NAVID) system - and aimed to assess its clinical applicability. Between 2000 and 2010, we treated 16 patients with the NAVID system: Le Fort I, III, III + I and IV distractions were performed in three, five, four and four patients, respectively. Distraction was started after a 1-week latency period. Then, the exposed rod was cut, and the distractors were left in place for 3 months or more as retention devices, and thereafter removed. All patients showed satisfactory occlusion and facial aesthetics. Open bite during the consolidation period was the main complication. In conclusion, the NAVID system is safe, effective and reliable for all types of Le Fort distraction osteogenesis. (C) 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Study of Internal Device versus External Device in Le Fort III Distraction for Syndromic Craniosynostosis
    Noto, Mariko
    Sakahara, Daisuke
    Kuwahara, Masamitsu
    Imai, Keisuke
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (03) : 530e - 540e
  • [22] Le fort II distraction osteogenesis with a hybrid system for an Apert syndrome patient: A case report
    Kobayashi, Shinji
    Fukawa, Toshihiko
    Yabuki, Yuichiro
    Satake, Toshihiko
    Maegawa, Jiro
    JPRAS OPEN, 2021, 27 : 34 - 39
  • [23] Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis
    Satoh, K
    Mitsukawa, N
    Hosaka, Y
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (03) : 1019 - 1028
  • [24] An Implantable Battery System for a Continuous Automatic Distraction Device for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Chung, M. D.
    Rivera, R. D.
    Feinberg, S. E.
    Sastry, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL DEVICES-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2010, 4 (04):
  • [25] Distraction osteogenesis of the midface: A new implantable distraction device
    Lin, KY
    Bill, TJ
    JOURNAL OF LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF MEDICAL IMPLANTS, 1999, 9 (04) : 413 - 423
  • [26] Le fort I distraction osteogenesis in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Lippold, C.
    Kelker, M.
    Danesh, G.
    Ehmer, U.
    Kleinheinz, J.
    Joos, U.
    Stamm, T.
    Hohoff, A.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B284 - B284
  • [27] An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis
    Tahiri, Youssef
    Taylor, Jesse
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 28 (04) : 184 - 192
  • [28] Discussion: Comparative Study of Internal Device versus External Device in Le Fort III Distraction for Syndromic Craniosynostosis
    Molina, Fernando
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (03) : 541e - 543e
  • [29] Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices
    Chin, M
    Toth, BA
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 100 (04) : 819 - 830
  • [30] The "FAD" (Floating Alveolar Device): A bidirectional distraction system for distraction osteogenesis of the alveolar process
    Robiony, M
    Toro, C
    Stucki-McCormick, SU
    Zerman, N
    Costa, F
    Politi, M
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (09) : 136 - 142