An internal distraction device for Le Fort distraction osteogenesis: The NAVID system

被引:8
|
作者
Nakajima, Hideo [1 ]
Sakamoto, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Tamada, Ikkei [2 ]
Ohara, Hirotoshi [3 ]
Kishi, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Shinjuku Ward, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Childrens Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Fuchu, Tokyo 1838561, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Saitama Natl Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Wako, Saitama 3510102, Japan
关键词
Crouzon syndrome; Apert syndrome; Cleft lip; Midface hypoplasia; Le Fort; Distraction osteogenesis; Internal distraction device; RIGID EXTERNAL DISTRACTION; MAXILLARY DISTRACTION; CLEFT-LIP; OSTEOTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; ADVANCEMENT; RELAPSE; PALATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Le Fort distraction osteogenesis is sometimes applied to improve the facial appearance in craniofacial dysostosis or cleft lip and palate. Distraction devices are generally classified into external and internal types. The movement of external distractors can be controlled easily but their large size and the need for a facial mask cause much psychological stress to the patient. Internal distractors are smaller and better tolerated, but they are not easily controllable and removal is difficult. We designed an internal distraction device to eliminate the problems of the currently available distractors -Nakajima's angle-variable internal distraction (NAVID) system - and aimed to assess its clinical applicability. Between 2000 and 2010, we treated 16 patients with the NAVID system: Le Fort I, III, III + I and IV distractions were performed in three, five, four and four patients, respectively. Distraction was started after a 1-week latency period. Then, the exposed rod was cut, and the distractors were left in place for 3 months or more as retention devices, and thereafter removed. All patients showed satisfactory occlusion and facial aesthetics. Open bite during the consolidation period was the main complication. In conclusion, the NAVID system is safe, effective and reliable for all types of Le Fort distraction osteogenesis. (C) 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an internal distraction device for syndromic craniosynostosis: Device selection, problems, indications, and a proposal for use of a parallel bar for device-setting
    Satoh, Kaneshige
    Mitsukawa, Nobuyuki
    Tosa, Yasuyoshi
    Kadomatsu, Kohichi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 17 (06) : 1050 - 1058
  • [32] Transport distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of calvarial bone defects using an internal distraction device: An experimental study
    Honda, T.
    Kobayashi, S.
    Kashiwa, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2006, : 29 - +
  • [33] Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis
    Wery, M. F.
    Nada, R. M.
    van der Meulen, J. J.
    Wolvius, E. B.
    Ongkosuwito, E. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 53 (03): : 285 - 291
  • [34] Le Fort I distraction with internal, submergible devices: 52 consecutive cases
    Chin, M
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2003, : 293 - 296
  • [35] Le Fort III Distraction With Internal vs External Distractors: A Cephalometric Analysis
    Robertson, Kevin J.
    Mendez, Bernardino M.
    Bruce, William J.
    McDonnell, Brendan D.
    Chiodo, Michael V.
    Patel, Parit A.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (05): : 721 - 727
  • [37] Minimally invasive Le Fort III distraction
    Hollier, L
    Kelly, P
    Babigumira, E
    Potochny, J
    Taylor, T
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 13 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [38] Internal distraction osteogenesis with a unidirectional device for reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects
    Rubio-Bueno, P
    Naval, L
    Rodriguez-Campo, F
    Gil-Díez, JL
    Díaz-González, FJ
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (05) : 598 - 608
  • [39] A custom-made distraction device for experimental mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Eski, M
    Nisanci, M
    Cil, Y
    Sengezer, M
    Özcan, A
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (04) : 675 - 683
  • [40] Distraction osteogenesis in maxillary deficiency using a rigid external distraction device
    Rachmiel, Adi
    Aizenbud, Dror
    Peled, Micha
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (07) : 2399 - 2406