Effects of ai-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma miss rate/adenoma detection rate: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Shao, Lei [1 ]
Yan, Xinzong [2 ]
Liu, Chengjiang [3 ]
Guo, Can [1 ]
Cai, Baojia [1 ]
机构
[1] Qinghai Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Univ, Basic Lab, Med Coll, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, He Fei, Peoples R China
关键词
adenoma detection rate; adenoma missed rate; artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; computer-aided diagnosis; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000031945
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy can detect colorectal adenomas and reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer, but there are still many missing diagnoses. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) can effectively reduce the rate of missed diagnosis and improve the detection rate of adenoma, but its clinical application is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the adenoma missed detection rate (AMR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by artificial colonoscopy. Methods: Conduct a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed, Medline database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis followed the direction of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis. The random effect model was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 12 articles were eventually included in the study. Computer aided detection (CADe) significantly decreased AMR compared with the control group (137/1039, 13.2% vs 304/1054, 28.8%; OR,0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.59; P < .05). Similarly, there was statistically significant difference in ADR between the CADe group and control group, respectively (1835/5041, 36.4% vs 1309/4553, 28.7%; OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.39-1.71; P < .05). The advanced adenomas missed rate and detection rate in CADe group was not statistically significant when compared with the control group. Conclusions: AIAC can effectively reduce AMR and improve ADR, especially small adenomas. Therefore, this method is worthy of clinical application. However, due to the limitations of the number and quality of the included studies, more in-depth studies are needed in the field of AIAC in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ENDOCUFF COLONOSCOPY VERSUS STANDARD COLONOSCOPY FOR ADENOMA DETECTION RATE - AN UPDATED META ANALYSIS
    Kesar, Varun
    Kanth, Rajan
    Karna, Nitu
    Roy, Praveen
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB374 - AB374
  • [42] Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Iannone, Andrea
    Maselli, Roberta
    Jovani, Manol
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Yu, Honggang
    Areia, Miguel
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Wallace, Michael
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 77 - +
  • [43] Meta-Analysis: AI-Assisted Colonoscopy Increases Detection of Polyps, Adenomas
    Anderer, Samantha
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 332 (23):
  • [44] Recurrence rate of pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Van Swol, Elizabeth G.
    Gupta, Annika
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Eiseman, Andrew S.
    ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY, 2024, 43 (02): : 208 - 216
  • [45] Improve Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy
    Kessing, Richard
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2019, 57 (05):
  • [46] The Efficacy of Image Enhanced Endoscopy Including Chromoendoscopy or CAP Attachment During Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection Rate; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Omata, Fumio
    Kobayashi, Daiki
    Deshpande, Gautam A.
    Mine, Tetsuya
    Fukui, Tsuguya
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 494 - 495
  • [47] Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Zohaib
    Haghbin, Hossein
    Pervez, Asad
    Goyal, Hemant
    Kamal, Faisal
    Kobeissy, Abdallah
    Nawras, Ali
    Adler, Douglas G.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (06) : E824 - E831
  • [48] DOES I-SCAN IMPROVE ADENOMA DETECTION RATE COMPARED TO HIGH-DEFINITION COLONOSCOPY? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Zohaib
    Haghbin, Hossein
    Pervez, Asad
    Goyal, Hemant
    Kamal, Faisal
    Kobeissy, Abdallah
    Nawras, Ali
    Adler, Douglas G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB112 - AB112
  • [49] Impact of Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate: A Meta-Analysis of High Quality Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kanakadandi, Vijay
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Wani, Sachin
    Bansal, Ajay
    Olyaee, Mojtaba S.
    Rastogi, Amit
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S769 - S770
  • [50] Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    J. Wang
    C. Ye
    S. Fei
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2023, 27 : 91 - 101