Effects of ai-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma miss rate/adenoma detection rate: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Shao, Lei [1 ]
Yan, Xinzong [2 ]
Liu, Chengjiang [3 ]
Guo, Can [1 ]
Cai, Baojia [1 ]
机构
[1] Qinghai Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Univ, Basic Lab, Med Coll, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, He Fei, Peoples R China
关键词
adenoma detection rate; adenoma missed rate; artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; computer-aided diagnosis; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000031945
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy can detect colorectal adenomas and reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer, but there are still many missing diagnoses. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) can effectively reduce the rate of missed diagnosis and improve the detection rate of adenoma, but its clinical application is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the adenoma missed detection rate (AMR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by artificial colonoscopy. Methods: Conduct a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed, Medline database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis followed the direction of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis. The random effect model was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 12 articles were eventually included in the study. Computer aided detection (CADe) significantly decreased AMR compared with the control group (137/1039, 13.2% vs 304/1054, 28.8%; OR,0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.59; P < .05). Similarly, there was statistically significant difference in ADR between the CADe group and control group, respectively (1835/5041, 36.4% vs 1309/4553, 28.7%; OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.39-1.71; P < .05). The advanced adenomas missed rate and detection rate in CADe group was not statistically significant when compared with the control group. Conclusions: AIAC can effectively reduce AMR and improve ADR, especially small adenomas. Therefore, this method is worthy of clinical application. However, due to the limitations of the number and quality of the included studies, more in-depth studies are needed in the field of AIAC in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of Smartphone Applications to Augment Colonoscopy Preparation Instructions and Effect on Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation and Adenoma Detection Rate - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ghazaleh, Sami
    Beran, Azizullah
    Ghazaleh, Dana
    Sayeh, Wasef
    Chuang, Justin
    Iqbal, Amna
    Nehme, Christian
    Patel, Dipen
    Malik, Sehrish
    Malhas, Saif-Eddin
    Abuhelwa, Ziad
    Sharma, Sachit
    Burlen, Jordan
    Nawras, Ali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S259 - S259
  • [32] EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy could improve adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jian, Hai Xu
    Feng, Bing Cheng
    Zhang, Yan
    Qu, Jun Yan
    Li, Yue Yue
    Zuo, Xiu Li
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2019, 20 (11) : 578 - 588
  • [33] Comparison of Adenoma Detection Rate Between Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy and Conventional Colonoscopy: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Studies
    Ragunathan, Karthik
    Vignesh, Shivakumar
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB397 - AB398
  • [34] Advanced adenoma detection rate is correlate more with adenoma per colonoscopy than adenoma detection rate
    Kim, Hyun-Young
    Park, Soo-Kyung
    Lee, Chang Kyun
    Cha, Jae Myung
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Han, Dong Soo
    Lee, Bo-In
    Jeongeun
    Park, Dong Il
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 100 - 100
  • [35] AmplifEYE-Assisted Colonoscopy in Surveillance Colonoscopy: Adenoma Detection Rate
    Kalinowski, Michael
    Kothari, Shana
    Silva, Rogelio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S281 - S281
  • [36] The Effect of Deep Sedation on Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopies: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Alomari, Mohammad
    Al Momani, Laith
    Bratton, Hunter
    Aasen, Tyler
    Thota, Prashanthi N.
    Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S151 - S152
  • [37] ENDOSCOPIST-TARGETED INTERVENTIONS TO OPTIMIZE ADENOMA DETECTION RATE - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Arora, Anshul
    Mcdonald, Cassandra
    Iansavichene, Alla
    Brahmania, Mayur
    Sey, Michael
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S416 - S417
  • [38] Comparison of Adenoma Detection Rate Between Water Exchange Colonoscopy and Air Insufflation Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis
    Ragunathan, Karthik
    Dadana, Sriharsha
    Kumar, Swati
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S119 - S119
  • [39] Endoscopy Unit Level Interventions to Improve Adenoma Detection Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Arora, Anshul
    Mcdonald, Cassandra
    Guizzetti, Leonardo
    Iansavichene, Alla
    Brahmania, Mayur
    Khanna, Nitin
    Wilson, Aze
    Jairath, Vipul
    Sey, Michael
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (13) : 3238 - 3257
  • [40] Polyp detection rate may predict adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis
    Niv, Yaron
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 30 (03) : 247 - 251