Effects of ai-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma miss rate/adenoma detection rate: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Shao, Lei [1 ]
Yan, Xinzong [2 ]
Liu, Chengjiang [3 ]
Guo, Can [1 ]
Cai, Baojia [1 ]
机构
[1] Qinghai Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Univ, Basic Lab, Med Coll, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, He Fei, Peoples R China
关键词
adenoma detection rate; adenoma missed rate; artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; computer-aided diagnosis; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000031945
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy can detect colorectal adenomas and reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer, but there are still many missing diagnoses. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) can effectively reduce the rate of missed diagnosis and improve the detection rate of adenoma, but its clinical application is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the adenoma missed detection rate (AMR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by artificial colonoscopy. Methods: Conduct a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed, Medline database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis followed the direction of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis. The random effect model was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 12 articles were eventually included in the study. Computer aided detection (CADe) significantly decreased AMR compared with the control group (137/1039, 13.2% vs 304/1054, 28.8%; OR,0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.59; P < .05). Similarly, there was statistically significant difference in ADR between the CADe group and control group, respectively (1835/5041, 36.4% vs 1309/4553, 28.7%; OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.39-1.71; P < .05). The advanced adenomas missed rate and detection rate in CADe group was not statistically significant when compared with the control group. Conclusions: AIAC can effectively reduce AMR and improve ADR, especially small adenomas. Therefore, this method is worthy of clinical application. However, due to the limitations of the number and quality of the included studies, more in-depth studies are needed in the field of AIAC in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endocuff-assisted versus Cap-assisted Colonoscopy in Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate: a Meta-Analysis
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Buccino, Rosario Vincenzo
    Sacco, Rodolfo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2020, 29 (03) : 415 - 420
  • [22] Effect of computer-aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shah, Sagar
    Park, Nathan
    Chehade, Nabil El Hage
    Chahine, Anastasia
    Monachese, Marc
    Tiritilli, Amelie
    Moosvi, Zain
    Ortizo, Ronald
    Samarasena, Jason
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 (02) : 162 - 176
  • [23] Adenoma Detection Rate of AmplifEYE™-Assisted Colonoscopy in Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Kalinowski, Michael
    Kothari, Shana
    Silva, Rogelio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S122 - S122
  • [24] Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    不详
    ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (09) : 846 - 860
  • [25] Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fernandes, Carlos
    Estevinho, Manuela
    Cruz, Manuel Marques
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 57 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [26] Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Hassan, Cesare
    La Marca, Marina
    Paci, Valentina
    Smania, Veronica
    De Bortoli, Nicola
    Bazzoli, Franco
    Repici, Alessandro
    Rex, Douglas
    Cadoni, Sergio
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (04) : 589 - +
  • [27] Impact of Electronic Chromoendoscopy on Adenoma Miss Rates During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Desai, Madhav
    Viswanathan, Lavanya
    Gupta, Neil
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Repici, Alessandro
    Hassan, Cesare
    Sharma, Prateek
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (09) : 1124 - 1134
  • [28] Meta-analysis indicates that add-on devices and new endoscopes reduce colonoscopy adenoma miss rate
    Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
    Tziatzios, Georgios
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Muscatiello, Nicola
    Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 30 (12) : 1482 - 1490
  • [29] Endocuff-assisted colonoscopyversuscap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Ai
    Yang, Jing-Ze
    Yang, Xiao-Xiao
    Feng, Bing-Cheng
    Zhang, Ming-Ming
    Qu, Jun-Yan
    Zhou, Ru-Chen
    Wang, Peng
    Li, Li-Xiang
    Zuo, Xiu-Li
    Li, Yan-Qing
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (12) : 2066 - 2073
  • [30] IMPACT OF FEEDBACK ON ADENOMA DETECTION RATE: A SYTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Jeepalyam, Sravan
    Desai, Madhav
    Buckles, Daniel
    Bonino, John A.
    Bansal, Ajay
    Olyaee, Mojtaba S.
    Rastogi, Amit
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB157 - AB157