Effects of ai-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma miss rate/adenoma detection rate: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Shao, Lei [1 ]
Yan, Xinzong [2 ]
Liu, Chengjiang [3 ]
Guo, Can [1 ]
Cai, Baojia [1 ]
机构
[1] Qinghai Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Univ, Basic Lab, Med Coll, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, He Fei, Peoples R China
关键词
adenoma detection rate; adenoma missed rate; artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; computer-aided diagnosis; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000031945
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy can detect colorectal adenomas and reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer, but there are still many missing diagnoses. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) can effectively reduce the rate of missed diagnosis and improve the detection rate of adenoma, but its clinical application is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the adenoma missed detection rate (AMR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by artificial colonoscopy. Methods: Conduct a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed, Medline database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis followed the direction of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis. The random effect model was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 12 articles were eventually included in the study. Computer aided detection (CADe) significantly decreased AMR compared with the control group (137/1039, 13.2% vs 304/1054, 28.8%; OR,0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.59; P < .05). Similarly, there was statistically significant difference in ADR between the CADe group and control group, respectively (1835/5041, 36.4% vs 1309/4553, 28.7%; OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.39-1.71; P < .05). The advanced adenomas missed rate and detection rate in CADe group was not statistically significant when compared with the control group. Conclusions: AIAC can effectively reduce AMR and improve ADR, especially small adenomas. Therefore, this method is worthy of clinical application. However, due to the limitations of the number and quality of the included studies, more in-depth studies are needed in the field of AIAC in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REDUCTION OF ADENOMA MISS RATE WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI): A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TANDEM TRIALS OF AI-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY
    Tolosa, Celestina
    Arayakarnkul, Suchapa
    Inal, Ekin
    White, Jacob
    Al Ghamdi, Sarah
    Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB727 - AB727
  • [2] New Technologies Increase Adenoma Detection Rate, Adenoma Miss Rate and Polyp Detection Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Castaneda, Daniel
    Verheyen, Elijah
    Wander, Praneet
    Popov, Violeta
    Gross, Seth A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S110 - S110
  • [3] New technologies improve adenoma detection rate, adenoma miss rate, and polyp detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Castaneda, Daniel
    Popov, Violeta B.
    Verheyen, Elijah
    Wander, Praneet
    Gross, Seth A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (02) : 209 - +
  • [4] Impact of cuff-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qi
    Gao, Hai-de
    Liu, Chun-Cheng
    Zhang, Hao
    Li, Xun-Hai
    Wu, Jia
    Zhang, Xian-Kai
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (20)
  • [5] The impact of linked color imaging on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zwetkoff, Bruna Haueisen Figueiredo
    Alberti, Luiz Ronaldo
    Rodrigues, Fabio Gontijo
    Carvas Junior, Nelson
    Ardengh, Jose Celso
    Neto, Otavio Micelli
    Guzman, Fernando Rodrigues
    Dias, Marcelo Morganti Ferreira
    Canejo, Guilherme Camarotti de Oliveira
    dos Santos, Carlos Eduardo Oliveira
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024,
  • [6] Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Shengbing
    Wang, Shuling
    Pan, Peng
    Xia, Tian
    Chang, Xin
    Yang, Xia
    Guo, Liliangzi
    Meng, Qiandian
    Yang, Fan
    Qian, Wei
    Xu, Zhichao
    Wang, Yuandiong
    Wang, Zhijie
    Gu, Lun
    Wang, Rundong
    Jia, Fangzhou
    Yao, Jun
    Li, Zhaoshen
    Bai, Yu
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : 1661 - +
  • [7] Improved Overall Adenoma Detection Rate and Sessile Serrated Adenoma Detection Rate With Endocuff: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Saligram, Shreyas
    Pant, Chaitanya
    Kanakadandi, Vijay
    Bansal, Ajay
    Wani, Sachin B.
    Rastogi, Amit
    Olyaee, Mojtaba S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB362 - AB362
  • [8] Effectiveness of artificial intelligence assisted colonoscopy on adenoma and polyp miss rate: A meta-analysis of tandem RCTs
    Maida, M.
    Marasco, G.
    Maas, M. H. J.
    Ramai, D.
    Spadaccini, M.
    Sinagra, E.
    Facciorusso, A.
    Siersema, P. D.
    Hassan, C.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2025, 57 (01) : 169 - 175
  • [9] Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boregowda, Umesha
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Paleti, Swathi
    Olyaee, Mojtaba
    Rastogi, Amit
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 34 (02): : 214 - +
  • [10] Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Piovani, Daniele
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Parigi, Tommaso
    Khalaf, Kareem
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Roesch, Thomas
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Mori, Yuichi
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Bonovas, Stefanos
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (02) : 212 - +