Extinction of likes and dislikes: effects of feature-specific attention allocation

被引:4
|
作者
Vanaelst, Jolien [1 ]
Spruyt, Adriaan [1 ]
Everaert, Tom [1 ]
De Houwer, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Psychol, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Evaluative conditioning; feature-specific attention allocation; extinction; selective attention; MISATTRIBUTION PROCEDURE; CONTINGENCY AWARENESS; CONTEXT THEORY; CATEGORIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; SIMILARITY; VALENCE; MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2016.1250724
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The evaluative conditioning (EC) effect refers to the change in the liking of a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) due to its pairing with another stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US). We examined whether the extinction rate of the EC effect is moderated by feature-specific attention allocation. In two experiments, CSs were abstract Gabor patches varying along two orthogonal, perceptual dimensions (i.e. spatial frequency and orientation). During the acquisition phase, one of these dimensions was predictive of the valence of the USs. During the extinction phase, CSs were presented alone and participants were asked to categorise the CSs either according to their valence, the perceptual dimension that was task-relevant during the acquisition phase, or a perceptual dimension that was task-irrelevant during the acquisition phase. As predicted, explicit valence measures revealed a linear increase in the extinction rate of the EC effect as participants were encouraged to assign attention to non-evaluative stimulus information during the extinction phase. In Experiment 1, Affect Misattribution Paradigm (AMP) data mimicked this pattern of results, although the effect just missed conventional levels of significance. In Experiment 2, the AMP data revealed an increase of the EC effect if attention was focused on evaluative stimulus information. Potential mechanisms to explain these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1609
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors underlying visual illusions are illusion-specific but not feature-specific
    Cretenoud, Aline F.
    Karimpur, Harun
    Grzeczkowski, Lukasz
    Francis, Gregory
    Hamburger, Kai
    Herzog, Michael H.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2019, 19 (14): : 1 - 21
  • [42] INTERFERENCE IN LETTER IDENTIFICATION - A TEST OF FEATURE-SPECIFIC INHIBITION
    SANTEE, JL
    EGETH, HE
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 27 (04): : 321 - 330
  • [43] Early feature-specific ERP-effects of visual awareness following binocular rivalry
    Roeber, Urte
    Veser, Sandra
    Schroger, Erich
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 : S105 - S105
  • [44] Adaptive Committees of Feature-Specific Classifiers for Image Classification
    Falchi, Fabrizio
    Fagni, Tiziano
    Sebastiani, Fabrizio
    ERCIM NEWS, 2009, (78): : 41 - 41
  • [45] Neural activation during an explicit categorization task: category- or feature-specific effects?
    Kraut, MA
    Moo, LR
    Segal, JB
    Hart, J
    COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (02): : 213 - 220
  • [46] Feature-Specific Encoding Flexibility in Visual Working Memory
    Kondo, Aki
    Saiki, Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [47] AGING AND FEATURE-SPECIFIC PRIMING OF FAMILIAR AND NOVEL STIMULI
    WIGGS, CL
    MARTIN, A
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1994, 9 (04) : 578 - 588
  • [48] Feature-specific neural reactivation during episodic memory
    Bone, Michael B.
    Ahmad, Fahad
    Buchsbaum, Bradley R.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [49] Feature-specific neural reactivation during episodic memory
    Michael B. Bone
    Fahad Ahmad
    Bradley R. Buchsbaum
    Nature Communications, 11
  • [50] Feature-Specific Illumination Patterns for Automated Visual Inspection
    Gruna, Robin
    Beyerer, Juergen
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2012, : 360 - 365