Extinction of likes and dislikes: effects of feature-specific attention allocation

被引:4
|
作者
Vanaelst, Jolien [1 ]
Spruyt, Adriaan [1 ]
Everaert, Tom [1 ]
De Houwer, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Psychol, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Evaluative conditioning; feature-specific attention allocation; extinction; selective attention; MISATTRIBUTION PROCEDURE; CONTINGENCY AWARENESS; CONTEXT THEORY; CATEGORIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; SIMILARITY; VALENCE; MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2016.1250724
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The evaluative conditioning (EC) effect refers to the change in the liking of a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) due to its pairing with another stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US). We examined whether the extinction rate of the EC effect is moderated by feature-specific attention allocation. In two experiments, CSs were abstract Gabor patches varying along two orthogonal, perceptual dimensions (i.e. spatial frequency and orientation). During the acquisition phase, one of these dimensions was predictive of the valence of the USs. During the extinction phase, CSs were presented alone and participants were asked to categorise the CSs either according to their valence, the perceptual dimension that was task-relevant during the acquisition phase, or a perceptual dimension that was task-irrelevant during the acquisition phase. As predicted, explicit valence measures revealed a linear increase in the extinction rate of the EC effect as participants were encouraged to assign attention to non-evaluative stimulus information during the extinction phase. In Experiment 1, Affect Misattribution Paradigm (AMP) data mimicked this pattern of results, although the effect just missed conventional levels of significance. In Experiment 2, the AMP data revealed an increase of the EC effect if attention was focused on evaluative stimulus information. Potential mechanisms to explain these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1609
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FEATURE-SPECIFIC INTERFERENCE IN LETTER IDENTIFICATION
    LA HEIJ, W
    VANDERHEIJDEN, AHC
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1983, 53 (01) : 37 - 60
  • [22] Applications of adaptive feature-specific imaging
    Ke, Jun
    Baheti, Pawan K.
    Neifeld, Mark A.
    VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING XVI, 2007, 6575
  • [23] Object-based attention involves the sequential activation of feature-specific cortical modules
    Schoenfeld, Mircea A.
    Hopf, Jens-Max
    Merkel, Christian
    Heinze, Hans-Jochen
    Hillyard, Steven A.
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 17 (04) : 619 - U186
  • [24] Adaptive feature-specific spectral imaging
    Jansen, P. A.
    Dunlop, M. J.
    Golish, D. R.
    Gehm, M. E.
    COMPRESSIVE SENSING, 2012, 8365
  • [25] Feature-specific vector quantization of images
    Wegmann, B
    Zetzsche, C
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (02) : 274 - 288
  • [26] FEATURE-SPECIFIC BORDER EFFECTS IN THE DISCRIMINATION OF LETTER-LIKE FORMS
    WHITE, MJ
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1981, 29 (02): : 156 - 162
  • [27] Feature-specific priming effects upon short duration binocular rivalry
    Ikeda, K
    Morotomi, T
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 2000, 43 (02) : 123 - 134
  • [28] Object-based attention involves the sequential activation of feature-specific cortical modules
    Mircea A Schoenfeld
    Jens-Max Hopf
    Christian Merkel
    Hans-Jochen Heinze
    Steven A Hillyard
    Nature Neuroscience, 2014, 17 : 619 - 624
  • [29] Optimizing measurements for feature-specific compressive sensing
    Mahalanobis, Abhijit
    Neifeld, Mark
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2014, 53 (26) : 6108 - 6118
  • [30] Minimum reconstruction error in feature-specific imaging
    Ke, J
    Stenner, MD
    Neifeld, MA
    VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING XIV, 2005, 5817 : 7 - 12