Extinction of likes and dislikes: effects of feature-specific attention allocation

被引:4
|
作者
Vanaelst, Jolien [1 ]
Spruyt, Adriaan [1 ]
Everaert, Tom [1 ]
De Houwer, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Psychol, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Evaluative conditioning; feature-specific attention allocation; extinction; selective attention; MISATTRIBUTION PROCEDURE; CONTINGENCY AWARENESS; CONTEXT THEORY; CATEGORIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; SIMILARITY; VALENCE; MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2016.1250724
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The evaluative conditioning (EC) effect refers to the change in the liking of a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) due to its pairing with another stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US). We examined whether the extinction rate of the EC effect is moderated by feature-specific attention allocation. In two experiments, CSs were abstract Gabor patches varying along two orthogonal, perceptual dimensions (i.e. spatial frequency and orientation). During the acquisition phase, one of these dimensions was predictive of the valence of the USs. During the extinction phase, CSs were presented alone and participants were asked to categorise the CSs either according to their valence, the perceptual dimension that was task-relevant during the acquisition phase, or a perceptual dimension that was task-irrelevant during the acquisition phase. As predicted, explicit valence measures revealed a linear increase in the extinction rate of the EC effect as participants were encouraged to assign attention to non-evaluative stimulus information during the extinction phase. In Experiment 1, Affect Misattribution Paradigm (AMP) data mimicked this pattern of results, although the effect just missed conventional levels of significance. In Experiment 2, the AMP data revealed an increase of the EC effect if attention was focused on evaluative stimulus information. Potential mechanisms to explain these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1609
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feature-Specific Salience Maps in Human Cortex
    Thayer, Daniel D.
    Sprague, Thomas C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 43 (50): : 8785 - 8800
  • [32] Is Visual Working Memory Decay Feature-Specific?
    Kurki, Ilmari
    Kaukinen, Crista
    Saarinen, Jussi
    PERCEPTION, 2019, 48 : 157 - 157
  • [33] Space-time feature-specific imaging
    Treeaporn, Vicha
    Ashok, Amit
    Neifeld, Mark A.
    VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING XX, 2011, 8056
  • [34] Face recognition by using feature-specific imaging
    Pal, HS
    Ganotra, D
    Neifeld, MA
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2005, 44 (18) : 3784 - 3794
  • [35] Feature-specific facilitation following a spatial cue
    Burnett, K. E.
    Close, A. C.
    d'Avossa, G.
    Sapir, A.
    PERCEPTION, 2010, 39 : 78 - 78
  • [36] Feature-specific prediction errors for visual mismatch
    Stefanics, Gabor
    Stephan, Klaas Enno
    Heinzle, Jakob
    NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 196 : 142 - 151
  • [37] Feature-specific ski injuries in snow parks
    Carus, Luis
    Escorihuela, Maria
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2016, 95 : 86 - 90
  • [38] Feature-specific electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation
    Fahle, M
    Quenzer, T
    Braun, C
    Spang, K
    VISION RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (01) : 7 - 19
  • [39] Random projections based feature-specific structured imaging
    Baheti, Pawan K.
    Neifeld, Mark A.
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2008, 16 (03): : 1764 - 1776
  • [40] FEATURE-SPECIFIC HISTOPATHOLOGICAL GRADING OF MURINE CARTILAGE DEGENERATION
    Liu, L. P.
    Hsu, F. H.
    Lotz, M. K.
    Sah, R. L.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2018, 26 : S453 - S455