Propofol-alfentanil versus fentanyl-midazolam in coronary artery surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Collard, E
Delire, V
Mayne, A
Jamart, J
Louagie, Y
Gonzalez, M
Ducart, A
Broka, S
Randour, P
Joucken, K
机构
[1] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT BIOSTAT,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[2] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT CARDIOVASC & THORAC SURG,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[3] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT INTENS CARE MED,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
关键词
propofol; alfentanil; coronary artery surgery; early extubation; hemodynamics;
D O I
10.1016/S1053-0770(96)80048-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic profiles and recovery characteristics of propofol-alfentanil with fentanyl-midazolam anesthesia in elective coronary artery surgery. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Fifty patients with impaired or good left ventricular function. Interventions: In group 1, (n = 25) anesthesia was induced with an infusion of propofol, 3 to 4 mg/kg/h, alfentanil, 500 mu g, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg, and maintained with propofol, 3 to 6 mg/kg/h (variable rate), and alfentanil infusions, 30 mu g/kg/h (fixed rate). Additional boluses of alfentanil, 1 mg, were administered before noxious stimuli; group 2 (n = 25) received a loading dose of fentanyl, 25 mu g/kg, midazolam, 1.5 to 3 mg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg for induction, followed by an infusion of fentanyl, 7 mu g/kg/h, for maintenance. Additional boluses of midazolam (1.5 to 3 mg) and fentanyl (250 mu g) were administered before noxious stimuli. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiovascular parameters at eight intraoperative time points as well as time to extubation, morphine consumption, and pain scores were recorded. Induction of anesthesia was associated in both groups with a small but significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (1: 15 mmHg (15%); 2: 8 mmHg (8%) with significant decreases in cardiac index (1: 8%; 2: 8%) and left ventricular stroke work index (1: 24%; 2: 21%). Throughout surgery, hemodynamic profiles were comparable between groups except after intubation when the MAP was significantly lower in group 1 (75 +/- 12 mmHg) than in group 2 (89 +/- 17 mmHg). Group 1 required less inotropic support. Extubation was performed faster in group 1 (7.6 h) than in group 2 (18.0 h). Morphine requirements and pain scores were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Propofol-alfentanil anesthesia provides good intraoperative hemodynamics and allows early extubation after coronary artery surgery. Copyright (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company
引用
下载
收藏
页码:869 / 876
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CONTINUOUS INFUSION OF FENTANYL OR ALFENTANIL FOR CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY - PLASMA OPIATE CONCENTRATIONS, HEMODYNAMICS AND POSTOPERATIVE COURSE
    HYNYNEN, M
    TAKKUNEN, O
    SALMENPERA, M
    HAATAJA, H
    HEINONEN, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 58 (11) : 1252 - 1259
  • [42] Efficacy of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl for endoscopic urology surgery
    Bharti, Neerja
    Batra, Yatindra K.
    Negi, Sunder L.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 21 (02) : 13 - 16
  • [43] Remifentanil-propofol versus fentanyl-midazolam combinations for intracranial surgery. Influence of anaesthesia technique and intensive sedation on ventilation times and duration of stay in the ICU [Remifentanil-propofol- versus fentanyl-midazolam-kombination bei intrakraniellen eingriffen. Einfluss von anästhesietechnik und intensivanalgosedierung auf beatmungszeiten und dauer des intensivaufenthalts]
    Bauer C.
    Kreuer S.
    Ketter R.
    Grundmann U.
    Wilhelm W.
    Der Anaesthesist, 2007, 56 (2) : 128 - 132
  • [44] Comparison of dipyrone/propofol versus fentanyl/propofol anaesthesia during surgery in rabbits
    Baumgartner, C.
    Koenighaus, H.
    Ebner, J.
    Henke, J.
    Schuster, T.
    Erhardt, W.
    LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2011, 45 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [45] Sedoanalgesia for cardioversion: comparison of alfentanil, remifentanil and fentanyl combined with propofol and midazolam: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Ozkan, G.
    Ince, M. E.
    Eskin, M. B.
    Erol, G.
    Kadan, M.
    Ozgur, G.
    Doganci, S.
    Yildirim, V.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (06) : 1140 - 1148
  • [46] Propofol and Midazolam versus propofol alone for sedation following coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Walder, B
    Borgeat, A
    Suter, PM
    Romand, JA
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2002, 30 (02) : 171 - 178
  • [47] TO EVALUATE THE EFFECT OF LOW DOSE FENTANYL-MIDAZOLAM COMBINATION ON SEVOFLURANE/PROPOFOL INDUCTION IN ADULT USING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Pareek, Ashish
    Bhataia, Sneha
    Jain, Sadhana
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (59): : 4086 - 4091
  • [48] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL IN COMPARISON TO MIDAZOLAM - A STUDY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY
    KLING, D
    BACHMANN, B
    MOOSDORF, R
    HEMPELMANN, G
    ANAESTHESIST, 1987, 36 (11): : 640 - 645
  • [49] Sedation During EGD in Cirrhotic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl
    Correia, Lucianna M.
    Queiroz, Danielle
    Lenz, Luciano
    Tafarel, Jean
    Gomes, Gustavo F.
    Martins, Fernanda P.
    Nakao, Frank S.
    Rodrigues, Rodrigo A.
    Rohr, Maria Rachel S.
    Ferrari, Angelo P.
    Libera, Ermelindo D.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB211 - AB211
  • [50] Efficiency of propofol sedation versus conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl in a pediatric endoscopy unit
    Lightdale, J
    Valim, C
    Newburg, A
    Zgleszewski, S
    Donovan, K
    Heard, L
    Fox, V
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB92 - AB92