Propofol-alfentanil versus fentanyl-midazolam in coronary artery surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Collard, E
Delire, V
Mayne, A
Jamart, J
Louagie, Y
Gonzalez, M
Ducart, A
Broka, S
Randour, P
Joucken, K
机构
[1] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT BIOSTAT,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[2] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT CARDIOVASC & THORAC SURG,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[3] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT INTENS CARE MED,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
关键词
propofol; alfentanil; coronary artery surgery; early extubation; hemodynamics;
D O I
10.1016/S1053-0770(96)80048-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic profiles and recovery characteristics of propofol-alfentanil with fentanyl-midazolam anesthesia in elective coronary artery surgery. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Fifty patients with impaired or good left ventricular function. Interventions: In group 1, (n = 25) anesthesia was induced with an infusion of propofol, 3 to 4 mg/kg/h, alfentanil, 500 mu g, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg, and maintained with propofol, 3 to 6 mg/kg/h (variable rate), and alfentanil infusions, 30 mu g/kg/h (fixed rate). Additional boluses of alfentanil, 1 mg, were administered before noxious stimuli; group 2 (n = 25) received a loading dose of fentanyl, 25 mu g/kg, midazolam, 1.5 to 3 mg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg for induction, followed by an infusion of fentanyl, 7 mu g/kg/h, for maintenance. Additional boluses of midazolam (1.5 to 3 mg) and fentanyl (250 mu g) were administered before noxious stimuli. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiovascular parameters at eight intraoperative time points as well as time to extubation, morphine consumption, and pain scores were recorded. Induction of anesthesia was associated in both groups with a small but significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (1: 15 mmHg (15%); 2: 8 mmHg (8%) with significant decreases in cardiac index (1: 8%; 2: 8%) and left ventricular stroke work index (1: 24%; 2: 21%). Throughout surgery, hemodynamic profiles were comparable between groups except after intubation when the MAP was significantly lower in group 1 (75 +/- 12 mmHg) than in group 2 (89 +/- 17 mmHg). Group 1 required less inotropic support. Extubation was performed faster in group 1 (7.6 h) than in group 2 (18.0 h). Morphine requirements and pain scores were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Propofol-alfentanil anesthesia provides good intraoperative hemodynamics and allows early extubation after coronary artery surgery. Copyright (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company
引用
下载
收藏
页码:869 / 876
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Propofol Versus Midazolam/Fentanyl Sedation for Colonoscopy in the Elderly Patient Population
    Lovett, Pamela
    Gomez, Victoria
    Hodge, David O.
    Ladlie, Beth
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2017, 32 (03) : 210 - 214
  • [32] Monitored anaesthesia care with remifentanil versus anaesthesia with propofol-alfentanil: Effects on in vitro fertilization outcome.
    Matsota, P.
    Batistaki, C.
    Sidiropoulou, T.
    Pandazi, A.
    Grigoropoulou, I
    Krepi, E.
    Giannaris, D.
    Salamalekis, E.
    Kostopanagiotou, G.
    ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 27 : 203 - 203
  • [33] Comparison of the effects of ketamine-midazolam with those of fentanyl-midazolam on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during major spine surgery
    Langeron, O
    Lille, F
    Zerhouni, O
    Orliaguet, G
    Saillant, G
    Riou, B
    Coriat, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (06) : 701 - 706
  • [34] An economic evaluation of propofol/fentanyl compared with midazolam/fentanyl on recovery in the ICU following cardiac surgery
    Sherry, KM
    McNamara, J
    Brown, JS
    Drummond, M
    ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (04) : 312 - 317
  • [35] Hemodynamic, hepatorenal, and postoperative effects of desflurane-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia in coronary artery bypass surgery
    But, AK
    Durmus, M
    Toprak, HI
    Ozturk, E
    Demirbilek, S
    Ersoy, MO
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2005, 19 (05) : 597 - 602
  • [36] A comparison of the effects of propofol-alfentanil versus isoflurane anesthesia on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation
    Reid, CW
    Slinger, PD
    Lenis, S
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 1996, 10 (07) : 860 - 863
  • [37] A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil for use with propofol in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery
    Ahonen, J
    Olkkola, KT
    Verkkala, K
    Heikkinen, L
    Järvinen, A
    Salmenperä, M
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (06): : 1269 - 1274
  • [38] Propofol Versus Midazolam/Fentanyl for Outpatient Colonoscopy: Administration by Nurses Supervised by Endoscopists
    Ulmer, Brian J.
    Hansen, Jonathan J.
    Overley, Christine A.
    Symms, Michelle R.
    Chadalawada, Vidyasree
    Liangpunsakul, Suthat
    Strahl, Eloise
    Mendel, April M.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 1 (06) : 425 - 432
  • [39] Propofol and ketamine versus fentanyl for open heart surgery
    Botero, CA
    Smith, CE
    Holbrook, C
    Pinchak, AC
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (04): : SC121 - SC121
  • [40] Intravenous Infusion Anesthesis with Propofol-Midazolam-Fentanyl for Experimental Surgery in Swine
    Kaiser, Gernot M.
    Fruehauf, Nils R.
    Zhang, Hongwei
    Westermann, Stephanie
    Bolle, Ines
    Oldhafer, Karl J.
    Broelsch, Christoph E.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2003, 16 (06) : 353 - 357