Objectives: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic profiles and recovery characteristics of propofol-alfentanil with fentanyl-midazolam anesthesia in elective coronary artery surgery. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Fifty patients with impaired or good left ventricular function. Interventions: In group 1, (n = 25) anesthesia was induced with an infusion of propofol, 3 to 4 mg/kg/h, alfentanil, 500 mu g, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg, and maintained with propofol, 3 to 6 mg/kg/h (variable rate), and alfentanil infusions, 30 mu g/kg/h (fixed rate). Additional boluses of alfentanil, 1 mg, were administered before noxious stimuli; group 2 (n = 25) received a loading dose of fentanyl, 25 mu g/kg, midazolam, 1.5 to 3 mg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg for induction, followed by an infusion of fentanyl, 7 mu g/kg/h, for maintenance. Additional boluses of midazolam (1.5 to 3 mg) and fentanyl (250 mu g) were administered before noxious stimuli. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiovascular parameters at eight intraoperative time points as well as time to extubation, morphine consumption, and pain scores were recorded. Induction of anesthesia was associated in both groups with a small but significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (1: 15 mmHg (15%); 2: 8 mmHg (8%) with significant decreases in cardiac index (1: 8%; 2: 8%) and left ventricular stroke work index (1: 24%; 2: 21%). Throughout surgery, hemodynamic profiles were comparable between groups except after intubation when the MAP was significantly lower in group 1 (75 +/- 12 mmHg) than in group 2 (89 +/- 17 mmHg). Group 1 required less inotropic support. Extubation was performed faster in group 1 (7.6 h) than in group 2 (18.0 h). Morphine requirements and pain scores were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Propofol-alfentanil anesthesia provides good intraoperative hemodynamics and allows early extubation after coronary artery surgery. Copyright (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company