Propofol-alfentanil versus fentanyl-midazolam in coronary artery surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Collard, E
Delire, V
Mayne, A
Jamart, J
Louagie, Y
Gonzalez, M
Ducart, A
Broka, S
Randour, P
Joucken, K
机构
[1] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT BIOSTAT,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[2] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT CARDIOVASC & THORAC SURG,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[3] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT INTENS CARE MED,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
关键词
propofol; alfentanil; coronary artery surgery; early extubation; hemodynamics;
D O I
10.1016/S1053-0770(96)80048-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic profiles and recovery characteristics of propofol-alfentanil with fentanyl-midazolam anesthesia in elective coronary artery surgery. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Fifty patients with impaired or good left ventricular function. Interventions: In group 1, (n = 25) anesthesia was induced with an infusion of propofol, 3 to 4 mg/kg/h, alfentanil, 500 mu g, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg, and maintained with propofol, 3 to 6 mg/kg/h (variable rate), and alfentanil infusions, 30 mu g/kg/h (fixed rate). Additional boluses of alfentanil, 1 mg, were administered before noxious stimuli; group 2 (n = 25) received a loading dose of fentanyl, 25 mu g/kg, midazolam, 1.5 to 3 mg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg for induction, followed by an infusion of fentanyl, 7 mu g/kg/h, for maintenance. Additional boluses of midazolam (1.5 to 3 mg) and fentanyl (250 mu g) were administered before noxious stimuli. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiovascular parameters at eight intraoperative time points as well as time to extubation, morphine consumption, and pain scores were recorded. Induction of anesthesia was associated in both groups with a small but significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (1: 15 mmHg (15%); 2: 8 mmHg (8%) with significant decreases in cardiac index (1: 8%; 2: 8%) and left ventricular stroke work index (1: 24%; 2: 21%). Throughout surgery, hemodynamic profiles were comparable between groups except after intubation when the MAP was significantly lower in group 1 (75 +/- 12 mmHg) than in group 2 (89 +/- 17 mmHg). Group 1 required less inotropic support. Extubation was performed faster in group 1 (7.6 h) than in group 2 (18.0 h). Morphine requirements and pain scores were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Propofol-alfentanil anesthesia provides good intraoperative hemodynamics and allows early extubation after coronary artery surgery. Copyright (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company
引用
下载
收藏
页码:869 / 876
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stress response in infants undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized study of fentanyl bolus, fentanyl infusion and fentanyl-midazolam infusion
    Gruber, EM
    Casta, A
    Laussen, PC
    Zurakowski, D
    Hansen, DD
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (3A) : U497 - U497
  • [22] Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation
    Taylor, DM
    O'Brien, D
    Ritchie, P
    Pasco, J
    Cameron, PA
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [23] TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA WITH ALFENTANIL-MIDAZOLAM (AL-M) VERSUS FENTANYL-FLUNITRAZEPAM (FE-5) IN CORONARY SURGERY
    GOB, E
    SPATH, P
    BARANKAY, A
    RICHTER, JA
    ANAESTHESIST, 1984, 33 (09): : 463 - 463
  • [24] Fentanyl and midazolam anaesthesia for coronary bypass surgery
    Jakobsson, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (06) : 941 - 941
  • [25] A Comparison of Patients' Satisfaction With Two Different Sedation Regimens for Endoscopy: Propofol, Midazolam and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl
    Lachter, Jesse
    Elzam, Yaniv
    Gralnek, Ian M.
    Chermesh, Irit
    Eliakim, Rami
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB114 - AB115
  • [26] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF PIPECURONIUM BROMIDE DURING FENTANYL-MIDAZOLAM ANESTHESIA INDUCTION FOR CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-GRAFTING
    TASSONYI, E
    NEIDHART, P
    TATTI, B
    GEMPERLE, M
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1986, 65 (3A) : A284 - A284
  • [27] OPIOID SUPPLEMENTATION DURING PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA - THE EFFECTS OF FENTANYL OR ALFENTANIL ON PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA IN DAYCASE SURGERY
    MOFFAT, AC
    MURRAY, AW
    FITCH, W
    ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (08) : 644 - 647
  • [28] Retrospective comparison of propofol-fentanyl with midazolam-fentanyl in open heart surgery
    Kaneko, S
    Miyagawa, Y
    Watanabe, S
    Kano, T
    NEW BALANCED ANESTHESIA, 1998, 1164 : 181 - 182
  • [29] PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA VERSUS PARACERVICAL BLOCKADE WITH ALFENTANIL AND MIDAZOLAM SEDATION FOR OUTPATIENT ABORTION
    RAEDER, JC
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 36 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [30] Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl, and sufentanil in TIVA with propofol in patients undergoing CABG surgery
    Ahonen, J
    Olkkola, KT
    Hynynen, M
    Ikävalko, H
    Seppälä, T
    Salmenperä, M
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (3A) : U204 - U204