Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for the Evaluation of Optimum Green Energy Sources: A Case Study

被引:15
|
作者
Bhowmik, Chiranjib [1 ]
Dhar, Sreerupa [2 ]
Ray, Amitava [3 ]
机构
[1] Parul Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, Parul Inst Engn & Technol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[2] MCKV Inst Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Howrah, India
[3] Jalpaiguri Govt Engn Coll, Jalpaiguri, India
关键词
Comparative Analysis; COPRAS; Entropy; Green Energy Source Selection; MOOSRA; Sensitivity Analysis; TOPSIS; COMPLEX PROPORTIONAL ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; MULTICRITERIA ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SELECTION; RANKING; ALTERNATIVES; POLICY; TURKEY;
D O I
10.4018/IJDSST.2019100101
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to select the optimum green energy sources for sustainable planning from a given set of energy alternatives. This study examines the combined behavior of multi-criteria decision-making approaches-TOPSIS, MOOSRA and COPRAS are used to evaluate the green energy sources- solar, hydro, biogas and biomass and to identify the optimum source by appraising its functioning features based on entropy probability technique. An illustrative case study is presented in order to demonstrate the application feasibility of the combined approaches for the ranking of optimum green energy sources. The analyzed results show that biogas is the optimum green energy source having the highest score value obtained by combined approaches. The sensitivity analysis shows the robustness of the combined approaches with the highest effectiveness. The study not only considers the various cost criteria but other actors like power generation, implementation period and useful life are also considered to select the optimum green energy sources for future project investment.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Analysis of the Simple WISP and Some Prominent MCDM Methods: A Python']Python Approach
    Stanujkic, Dragisa
    Karabasevic, Darjan
    Popovic, Gabrijela
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Saracevic, Muzafer
    Stanimirovic, Predrag S.
    Ulutas, Alptekin
    Katsikis, Vasilios N.
    Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, Ieva
    AXIOMS, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [42] Optimum green energy solution to address the remote islands' water-energy nexus: the case study of Nisyros island
    Triantafyllou, Panagiotis
    Koroneos, Christofis
    Kondili, Emilia
    Kollas, Panagiotis
    Zafirakis, Dimitrios
    Ktenidis, Panagiotis
    Kaldellis, John K.
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (09)
  • [43] Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis
    Valipour, Alireza
    Sarvari, Hadi
    Tamosaitiene, Jolanta
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (04):
  • [44] Green hydrogen technology development and usage policymaking in Iran using SWOT analysis and MCDM methods
    Rahimirad, Zohreh
    Sadabadi, Ali Asghar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (40) : 15179 - 15194
  • [45] USABILITY OF THE MCDM AND MULTIVARIATE METHODS IN THE PROCESS OF THE REGIONAL DISPARITIES EVALUATION: CASE OF THE VISEGRAD GROUP
    Minarcikova, Eva
    PROCEEDINGS OF 14TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRIES, PTS 1 AND 2, 2016, : 471 - 480
  • [46] A comparative study of the evaluation methods for pozzolans
    Pourkhorshidi, A. R.
    Najimi, M.
    Parhizkar, T.
    Hillemeier, B.
    Herr, R.
    ADVANCES IN CEMENT RESEARCH, 2010, 22 (03) : 157 - 164
  • [47] COMPARATIVE STUDY ON METHODS FOR CADMIUM ANALYSIS OF GRAIN WITH AN APPLICATION TO POLLUTION EVALUATION
    KJELLSTROM, T
    LIND, B
    LINNMAN, L
    NORDBERG, G
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1974, 8 (01) : 92 - 106
  • [48] Asian green building rating tools: A comparative study on scoring methods of quantitative evaluation systems
    Zhang, Xiang
    Zhan, Changhong
    Wang, Xuesong
    Li, Guanghao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 218 : 880 - 895
  • [49] Comparative analysis of chaos control methods: A mechanical system case study
    de Paula, Aline Souza
    Savi, Marcelo Amorim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2011, 46 (08) : 1076 - 1089
  • [50] EVALUATION OF FACTOR ANALYSIS METHODS: STUDENT FEEDBACK CASE STUDY
    Novak, Matija
    Slibar, Barbara
    Kermek, Dragutin
    Redep, Nina Begicevic
    14TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2020), 2020, : 8208 - 8216