Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for the Evaluation of Optimum Green Energy Sources: A Case Study

被引:15
|
作者
Bhowmik, Chiranjib [1 ]
Dhar, Sreerupa [2 ]
Ray, Amitava [3 ]
机构
[1] Parul Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, Parul Inst Engn & Technol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[2] MCKV Inst Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Howrah, India
[3] Jalpaiguri Govt Engn Coll, Jalpaiguri, India
关键词
Comparative Analysis; COPRAS; Entropy; Green Energy Source Selection; MOOSRA; Sensitivity Analysis; TOPSIS; COMPLEX PROPORTIONAL ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; MULTICRITERIA ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SELECTION; RANKING; ALTERNATIVES; POLICY; TURKEY;
D O I
10.4018/IJDSST.2019100101
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to select the optimum green energy sources for sustainable planning from a given set of energy alternatives. This study examines the combined behavior of multi-criteria decision-making approaches-TOPSIS, MOOSRA and COPRAS are used to evaluate the green energy sources- solar, hydro, biogas and biomass and to identify the optimum source by appraising its functioning features based on entropy probability technique. An illustrative case study is presented in order to demonstrate the application feasibility of the combined approaches for the ranking of optimum green energy sources. The analyzed results show that biogas is the optimum green energy source having the highest score value obtained by combined approaches. The sensitivity analysis shows the robustness of the combined approaches with the highest effectiveness. The study not only considers the various cost criteria but other actors like power generation, implementation period and useful life are also considered to select the optimum green energy sources for future project investment.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry
    Anojkumar, L.
    Ilangkumaran, M.
    Sasirekha, V.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (06) : 2964 - 2980
  • [22] Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for Assessing the Severity of Chronic Liver Disease
    Piegat, Andrzej
    Salabun, Wojciech
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, PT I, 2015, 9119 : 228 - 238
  • [23] Comparative analysis on washability indices of anthracite coal by using MCDM methods
    Sokolovic, Jovica
    Stanujki, Dragisa
    Stirbanovi, Zoran
    Ilic, Ivana
    PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2025, 61 (01):
  • [24] Comparative Analysis of Pythagorean MCDM Methods for the Risk Assessment of Childhood Cancer
    Habib, Shaista
    Akram, Muhammad
    Al-Shamiri, M. M. Ali
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2023, 135 (03): : 2585 - 2615
  • [25] Modeling and economic evaluation of hybrid renewable energy sources for green hydrogen production: A case study for the Mediterranean region
    Akdag, Ozan
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 240
  • [26] Evaluation of Urban Complex Utilization Based on AHP and MCDM Analysis: A Case Study of China
    Lu, Wenxi
    Zhang, Lei
    Liu, Yuqian
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (07)
  • [27] Evaluation of renewable energy sources for generating electricity in province of Yazd: a fuzzy MCDM approach
    Sadeghi, Arash
    Larimian, Taimaz
    Molabashi, Ali
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (BEM-2012), 2012, 62 : 1095 - 1099
  • [28] Evaluation of energy sources based on sustainability factors using integrated fuzzy MCDM approach
    Saraswat, Santosh K.
    Digalwar, Abhijeet K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2021, 15 (01) : 267 - 290
  • [29] Analysis of Hybrid MCDM Methods for the Performance Assessment and Ranking Public Transport Sector: A Case Study
    Goyal, Swati
    Agarwal, Shivi
    Singh, Narinderjit Singh Sawaran
    Mathur, Trilok
    Mathur, Nirbhay
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [30] Quality Evaluation of Cloud Services Using MCDM Techniques: A Comparative Analysis
    Monika
    Sangwan, O. P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (SOCPAR 2021), 2022, 417 : 371 - 383