Comparative analysis on washability indices of anthracite coal by using MCDM methods

被引:0
|
作者
Sokolovic, Jovica [1 ]
Stanujki, Dragisa [1 ]
Stirbanovi, Zoran [1 ]
Ilic, Ivana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Tech Fac Bor, Vojske Jugoslavije 12, Bor 19210, Serbia
来源
关键词
coal; gravity; separation; density; MCDM; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; CIRCUIT-DESIGN; SELECTION; CHOICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.37190/ppmp/199985
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for determining the optimal separation density in the gravity separation of anthracite coal, and also suggests an appropriate MCDM model for this purpose. Five separation densities were selected as the output and seven coal washability indices were used as the input based on the washability results of coal. The SAW, TOPSIS, WASPAS, WISP, and CoCoSo methods were used in this study. The evaluation indices of the five methods were averaged as a new index. Finally, alternative A4 (i.e., the optimal separation density is 1650 kg/m3) was selected as the final separation density.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determination of washability characteristics of anthracite coal by index of washability and near gravity material index - a case study
    Sokolovic, Jovica
    Ilic, Ivana
    Trumic, Milan
    Bogdanovic, Grozdanka
    Stirbanovic, Zoran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2024, 44 (05) : 503 - 518
  • [2] Options for washability analysis of coal - A literature review
    Galvin, K. P.
    COAL PREPARATION, 2006, 26 (04): : 209 - 234
  • [3] Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Opricovic, S
    Tzeng, GH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 156 (02) : 445 - 455
  • [4] A comparative analysis of prominently used MCDM methods in cloud environment
    Major Singh Neeraj
    Damanpreet Goraya
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2021, 77 : 3422 - 3449
  • [5] A comparative analysis of prominently used MCDM methods in cloud environment
    Neeraj
    Goraya, Major Singh
    Singh, Damanpreet
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2021, 77 (04): : 3422 - 3449
  • [6] Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability
    Mulliner, Emma
    Malys, Naglis
    Maliene, Vida
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 59 : 146 - 156
  • [7] Coal washability analysis using X-ray tomographic images for different lithotypes
    Liu, Hongping
    Rodrigues, Sandra
    Shi, Fengnian
    Esterle, Joan
    Manlapig, Emmanuel
    FUEL, 2017, 209 : 162 - 171
  • [8] ESTIMATION OF COAL WASHABILITY USING X-RADIOGRAPHY
    MOZA, AK
    NEAVEL, RC
    FUEL, 1986, 65 (04) : 547 - 551
  • [9] DEVELOPMENT OF WATER-BASED METHODS FOR DETERMINING COAL WASHABILITY DATA
    Callen, A. M.
    Patel, B.
    Zhou, J.
    Galvin, K. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2008, 28 (01) : 33 - 50
  • [10] Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for Product Aspect Ranking: TOPSIS and VIKOR
    Alrababah, Saif A. Ahmad
    Gan, Keng Hoon
    Tan, Tien-Ping
    2017 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICICS), 2017, : 76 - 81