Comparative analysis on washability indices of anthracite coal by using MCDM methods

被引：0

作者：

Sokolovic, Jovica ^{[1
]}

Stanujki, Dragisa ^{[1
]}

Stirbanovi, Zoran ^{[1
]}

Ilic, Ivana ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Belgrade, Tech Fac Bor, Vojske Jugoslavije 12, Bor 19210, Serbia

来源：

PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MINERAL PROCESSING | 2025年 / 61卷 / 01期

关键词：

coal; gravity; separation; density; MCDM; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; CIRCUIT-DESIGN; SELECTION; CHOICE; MODEL;

D O I：

10.37190/ppmp/199985

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

This paper presents the results of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for determining the optimal separation density in the gravity separation of anthracite coal, and also suggests an appropriate MCDM model for this purpose. Five separation densities were selected as the output and seven coal washability indices were used as the input based on the washability results of coal. The SAW, TOPSIS, WASPAS, WISP, and CoCoSo methods were used in this study. The evaluation indices of the five methods were averaged as a new index. Finally, alternative A4 (i.e., the optimal separation density is 1650 kg/m3) was selected as the final separation density.

引用

页数：19

共 50 条

[31] Anthracite Coal Flotation Using Dodecane and Nonyl Benzene
Miao, Zhenyong
Xing, Yaowen
Gui, Xiahui
Cao, Yijun
Wang, Tingxia
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2018, 38 (08) : 393 - 401
[32] Comparative Analysis of the Simple WISP and Some Prominent MCDM Methods: A Python']Python Approach
Stanujkic, Dragisa
Karabasevic, Darjan
Popovic, Gabrijela
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
Saracevic, Muzafer
Stanimirovic, Predrag S.
Ulutas, Alptekin
Katsikis, Vasilios N.
Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, Ieva
AXIOMS, 2021, 10 (04)
[33] Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods
Kou, Gang
Peng, Yi
Wang, Guoxun
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 275 : 1 - 12
[34] ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS OF LOCALIZATION OF THE COMPANY DEVELOPMENT USING MCDM METHODS IN PRACTICE
Dockalikova, Iveta
Klozikova, Jana
10TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2016, : 354 - 363
[35] Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis
Valipour, Alireza
Sarvari, Hadi
Tamosaitiene, Jolanta
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (04):
[36] Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for the Evaluation of Optimum Green Energy Sources: A Case Study
Bhowmik, Chiranjib
Dhar, Sreerupa
Ray, Amitava
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 11 (04) : 1 - 28
[37] Comparative study of durability of hybrid direct carbon fuel cells with anthracite coal and bituminous coal
Jiang, Cairong
Ma, Jianjun
Arenillas, Ana
Bonaccorso, A. Damiano
Irvine, John T. S.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (41) : 18797 - 18806
[38] Comparative Analysis of Solar Panels with Determination of Local Significance Levels of Criteria Using the MCDM Methods Resistant to the Rank Reversal Phenomenon
Baszkiewicz, Aleksandra
Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
Shekhovtsov, Andrii
Yelmikheiev, Mykhailo
Kozlov, Volodymyr
Salabun, Wojciech
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (18)
[39] Efficiency and mechanism analysis of the flotation of anthracite coal using soybean oil as an alternative sustainable collector
Li, Yijiang
Xia, Wencheng
Zhang, Ningning
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2021, 43 (18) : 2210 - 2217
[40] A thorough analysis of renewable hydrogen projects development in Uzbekistan using MCDM methods
Mostafaeipour, Ali
Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin Hosseini
Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini
Almutairi, Khalid
Taher, Rani
Issakhov, Alibek
Techato, Kuaanan
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (61) : 31174 - 31190

← 1 2 3 4 5 →