Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for the Evaluation of Optimum Green Energy Sources: A Case Study

被引:15
|
作者
Bhowmik, Chiranjib [1 ]
Dhar, Sreerupa [2 ]
Ray, Amitava [3 ]
机构
[1] Parul Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, Parul Inst Engn & Technol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[2] MCKV Inst Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Howrah, India
[3] Jalpaiguri Govt Engn Coll, Jalpaiguri, India
关键词
Comparative Analysis; COPRAS; Entropy; Green Energy Source Selection; MOOSRA; Sensitivity Analysis; TOPSIS; COMPLEX PROPORTIONAL ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; MULTICRITERIA ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SELECTION; RANKING; ALTERNATIVES; POLICY; TURKEY;
D O I
10.4018/IJDSST.2019100101
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to select the optimum green energy sources for sustainable planning from a given set of energy alternatives. This study examines the combined behavior of multi-criteria decision-making approaches-TOPSIS, MOOSRA and COPRAS are used to evaluate the green energy sources- solar, hydro, biogas and biomass and to identify the optimum source by appraising its functioning features based on entropy probability technique. An illustrative case study is presented in order to demonstrate the application feasibility of the combined approaches for the ranking of optimum green energy sources. The analyzed results show that biogas is the optimum green energy source having the highest score value obtained by combined approaches. The sensitivity analysis shows the robustness of the combined approaches with the highest effectiveness. The study not only considers the various cost criteria but other actors like power generation, implementation period and useful life are also considered to select the optimum green energy sources for future project investment.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan
    Lee, Hsing-Chen
    Chang, Ching-Ter
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 92 : 883 - 896
  • [2] Comparative analysis of MCDM for energy efficiency projects evaluation towards sustainable industrial energy management: Case study of a petrochemical complex
    Kshanh, Ibrahim
    Tanaka, Makoto
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 255
  • [3] ASSESSMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES USING MCDM METHOD: CASE STUDY
    Stojcetovic, Bojan
    Petkovic, Martina
    Durovic, Strahinja
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES ELECTRONICS AND ENERGETICS, 2023, 36 (03) : 353 - 363
  • [4] Selection of optimum green energy sources by considering environmental constructs and their technical criteria: a case study
    Bhowmik, Chiranjib
    Bhowmik, Sumit
    Ray, Amitava
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (09) : 13890 - 13918
  • [5] Selection of optimum green energy sources by considering environmental constructs and their technical criteria: a case study
    Chiranjib Bhowmik
    Sumit Bhowmik
    Amitava Ray
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 13890 - 13918
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for the Assessment of Corporate Sustainability Performance in Energy Sector
    Ersoy, Nazli
    Taslak, Soner
    EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 2023, 23 (03) : 341 - 362
  • [7] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOME PROMINENT MCDM METHODS: A CASE OF RANKING SERBIAN BANKS
    Stanujkic, Dragisa
    Dordevic, Bojan
    Dordevic, Mira
    SERBIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2013, 8 (02) : 213 - 241
  • [8] Green Energy Sources Selection for Sustainable Planning: A Case Study
    Bhowmik, Chiranjib
    Bhowmik, Sumit
    Ray, Amitava
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) : 1322 - 1334
  • [9] A comparative analysis study of alternative energy sources for automobiles
    Ugurlu, Adem
    Oztuna, Semiha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (34) : 11178 - 11188
  • [10] Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Opricovic, S
    Tzeng, GH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 156 (02) : 445 - 455