Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

被引:1211
|
作者
Opricovic, S
Tzeng, GH
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Management Technol, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Fac Civil Engn, YU-11000 Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
multiple criteria analysis; compromise; VIKOR; TOPSIS; comparison;
D O I
10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods VIKOR and TOPSIS are based on an aggregating function representing "closeness to the ideal", which originated in the compromise programming method. In VIKOR linear normalization and in TOPSIS vector normalization is used to eliminate the units of criterion functions. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking determines a compromise solution, providing a maximum "group utility" for the "majority" and a minimum of an individual regret for the "opponent". The TOPSIS method determines a solution with the shortest distance to the ideal solution and the greatest distance from the negative-ideal solution, but it does not consider the relative importance of these distances. A comparative analysis of these two methods is illustrated with a numerical example, showing their similarity and some differences. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for Product Aspect Ranking: TOPSIS and VIKOR
    Alrababah, Saif A. Ahmad
    Gan, Keng Hoon
    Tan, Tien-Ping
    2017 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICICS), 2017, : 76 - 81
  • [2] MCDM based on Reciprocal Judgment Matrix: a Comparative Study of E-VIKOR and E-TOPSIS Algorithmic Methods with Interval Numbers
    Dou, Yajie
    Zhang, Pengle
    Jiang, Jiang
    Yang, Kewei
    Chen, Yingwu
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (03): : 1401 - 1411
  • [3] Comparative analysis of TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS methods for the COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment
    Hezer, Seda
    Gelmez, Emel
    Ozceylan, Eren
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 14 (06) : 775 - 786
  • [4] Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods
    Salabun, Wojciech
    Watrobski, Jaroslaw
    Shekhovtsov, Andrii
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (09):
  • [5] New MCDM Algorithms with Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Soft TOPSIS, VIKOR and Aggregation Operators
    Alshammari, Ibtesam
    Parimala, Mani
    Ozel, Cenap
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Kammoun, Rania
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (17)
  • [6] Comparative Financial Performance Analysis of BIST-500 Listed Insurance Companies Using TOPSIS, VIKOR and MOORA Methods
    Kartal, Cem
    Ozdil, Zafer
    SOSYOEKONOMI, 2024, 32 (62) : 221 - 246
  • [7] A Comparative Analysis for Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods: TOPSIS, AHP, VIKOR Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
    Dammak, Fatma
    Baccour, Leila
    Alimi, Adel M.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), 2015,
  • [8] TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries
    Piwowarski, Mateusz
    Milaszewicz, Danuta
    Latuszynska, Malgorzata
    Borawski, Mariusz
    Nermend, Kesra
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KES-2018), 2018, 126 : 1683 - 1692
  • [9] Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS
    Shih, Hsu-Shih
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 186 (02) : 720 - 734
  • [10] A comparative analysis of prominently used MCDM methods in cloud environment
    Major Singh Neeraj
    Damanpreet Goraya
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2021, 77 : 3422 - 3449