Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

被引:1211
|
作者
Opricovic, S
Tzeng, GH
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Management Technol, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Fac Civil Engn, YU-11000 Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
multiple criteria analysis; compromise; VIKOR; TOPSIS; comparison;
D O I
10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods VIKOR and TOPSIS are based on an aggregating function representing "closeness to the ideal", which originated in the compromise programming method. In VIKOR linear normalization and in TOPSIS vector normalization is used to eliminate the units of criterion functions. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking determines a compromise solution, providing a maximum "group utility" for the "majority" and a minimum of an individual regret for the "opponent". The TOPSIS method determines a solution with the shortest distance to the ideal solution and the greatest distance from the negative-ideal solution, but it does not consider the relative importance of these distances. A comparative analysis of these two methods is illustrated with a numerical example, showing their similarity and some differences. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Analysis of Pythagorean MCDM Methods for the Risk Assessment of Childhood Cancer
    Habib, Shaista
    Akram, Muhammad
    Al-Shamiri, M. M. Ali
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2023, 135 (03): : 2585 - 2615
  • [22] A Comparative Evaluation of QoS-Based Network Selection Between TOPSIS and VIKOR
    Malathy, E. M.
    Muthuswamy, Vijayalakshmi
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, VOL 2, 2019, 56 : 109 - 115
  • [23] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RANK REVERSAL PHENOMENON IN THE EDAS AND TOPSIS METHODS
    Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2018, 52 (03): : 121 - 134
  • [24] The effects of anchoring in interactive MCDM solution methods
    Buchanan, JT
    Corner, JL
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (10) : 907 - 918
  • [25] TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods for Spherical Fuzzy Soft Set Aggregating Operator Framework
    Palanikumar, M.
    Arulmozhi, K.
    Manavalan, Lejo J.
    APPLICATIONS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (02): : 613 - 627
  • [26] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGY PUSH STRATEGIES INFLUENCING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES USING TOPSIS AND VIKOR TECHNIQUE
    Singla, Anuj
    Ahuja, Inderpreet Singh
    Sethi, Amanpreet Singh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (01) : 129 - 146
  • [27] Susceptibility of deforestation hotspots in Terai-Dooars belt of Himalayan Foothills: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS models
    Bera, Biswajit
    Shit, Pravat Kumar
    Sengupta, Nairita
    Saha, Soumik
    Bhattacharjee, Sumana
    JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY-COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 34 (10) : 8794 - 8806
  • [28] Pythagorean fuzzy soft MCGDM methods based on TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators
    Naeem, Khalid
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Peng, Xindong
    Afzal, Deeba
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (05) : 6937 - 6957
  • [29] Ranking OECD Countries according to Well-being Indicators Using TOPSIS, VIKOR and GRA Methods and an Integrated Solution Offer
    Danis, Yusuf Ali
    ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITESI IIBF DERGISI-ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 17 (02): : 433 - 454
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for the Assessment of Corporate Sustainability Performance in Energy Sector
    Ersoy, Nazli
    Taslak, Soner
    EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 2023, 23 (03) : 341 - 362