A comparative study of the evaluation methods for pozzolans

被引：21
|
作者：
Pourkhorshidi, A. R. [1 ]
Najimi, M. [1 ]
Parhizkar, T. [1 ]
Hillemeier, B. [2 ]
Herr, R. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Bldg & Housing Res Ctr, Dept Concrete Technol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Civil Engn, Berlin, Germany
来源：
ADVANCES IN CEMENT RESEARCH | 2010年 / 22卷 / 03期
关键词：
NATURAL POZZOLAN; CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; PORTLAND-CEMENT; ACTIVITY TESTS; FLY-ASH; PERFORMANCE; PASTES;
D O I：
10.1680/adcr.2010.22.3.157
中图分类号：
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号：
0813 ;
摘要：
The range of methodologies available for pozzolan classification, predicated on different viewpoints, may occasionally offer conflicting judgements regarding pozzolans. The present study compared the results obtained by assessing several natural pozzolans, silica fume and fly ash within the requirements of ASTM C618 and ASTM C1240. In addition, binary combinations of the pozzolans and Portland cement were investigated using EN 196-5. The outcomes manifested some anomalies between the different approaches. Complementary observations (such as environmental scanning electron microscope, insoluble residue and hardened concrete properties) were conducted to further clarify the results. The compressive strength and depth of water penetration of the concrete specimens containing the pozzolans revealed that EN 196-5 had superior compatibility with real concrete performance. This suggests that EN 196-5, which was originally developed for pozzolanic cements, can successfully determine the activity of Portland pozzolanic cements containing natural pozzolans, silica fume and fly ash.
引用
收藏
页码：157 / 164
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] POZZOLANIC PROPERTY OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC POZZOLANS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    CHATTERJI, S
    COLLEPARDI, M
    MORICONI, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1983, 80 (04): : 342 - 342
  • [2] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF COMFORT EVALUATION METHODS
    SLECHTA, RF
    WADE, E
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1957, 12 (04) : 444 - 444
  • [3] Comparative Study of the Reactivity and Performance of Different Nontraditional and Natural Pozzolans in Cementitious System
    Tokpatayeva, R.
    Castillo, A.
    Yoon, J.
    Kaladharan, G.
    Jafari, K.
    Arachchige, R. M.
    Rajabipour, F.
    Peethamparan, S.
    Olek, J.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2022, 11 (02): : 670 - 693
  • [4] Garment abrasion strength evaluation: a comparative methods study
    Miguel, Rui
    Lucas, Jose
    Carvalho, Lurdes
    Silva, Manuel Santos
    Manich, Albert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLOTHING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 19 (3-4) : 194 - 203
  • [5] A comparative study on methods for evaluation of Lightning Impulse Parameters
    Venkatesan, S
    Ranjan, PV
    Ashokaraju, D
    [J]. IEEE TENCON 2003: CONFERENCE ON CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION, VOLS 1-4, 2003, : 1562 - 1566
  • [6] Comparative study of conditional methods in slope reliability evaluation
    Huang, L.
    Zhang, Y.
    Lo, M. K.
    Cheng, Y. M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 127
  • [7] Evaluation of olfactory intensity:: Comparative study of two methods
    Atanasova, B
    Langlois, D
    Nicklaus, S
    Chabanet, C
    Etiévant, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2004, 19 (04) : 307 - 326
  • [8] Performance evaluation for classification methods: A comparative simulation study
    Kim, Yong Soo
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) : 2292 - 2306
  • [9] COMPARATIVE-STUDY ON VARIOUS METHODS OF BULL EVALUATION
    TAHIR, M
    BABAR, ME
    RASOOL, S
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1990, 60 (04): : 485 - 489
  • [10] Comparative Study of Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing Methods
    Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul
    Monaco, Valerie
    Thambuganipalle, Himabindu
    Schleyer, Titus
    [J]. ADVANCES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION IN HEALTH, 2009, 143 : 322 - +
12345