Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98:: reliability and validity

被引:16
|
作者
de Negreiros, Daniel Philippi [1 ]
Augusto da Silva Meleiro, Alexandrina Maria [2 ]
Furlanetto, Leticia M. [3 ]
Trzepacz, Paula T. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Postgrad Program Med Sci, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Med Sch Hosp, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Internal Med, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Mississippi, Sch Med, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
delirium; psychiatric status rating scales; validation studies;
D O I
10.1002/gps.1906
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). Methods The scale was translated into Portuguese and back-translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (n = 64; delirium, depression, dementia, schizophrenia and others) were evaluated by two independent researchers blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnosis and severity of delirium as measured by the DRS-R-98 were compared to clinical diagnosis, Mini-Mental State Exam, Confusion Assessment Method, and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Results Mean and rnedian DRS-R-98 total scores significantly distinguished delirium from the other groups (p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability (ICC between 0.9 and 1) and internal consistency (alpha = 0.91) were very high. DRS-R-98 severity scores correlated highly with the CGI. Mean DRS-R-98 severity scores during delirium differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the post-treatment values. The area under the curve established by ROC analysis was 0.99 and using the cut-off Value of 20 the scale showed sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 94.6%, respectively. Conclusion The Portuguese version of the DRS-R-98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium that distinguishes delirium from other disorders and is sensitive to change in delirium severity, which may be of great value for longitudinal studies. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 477
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Concordance between DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for delirium diagnosis in a pooled database of 768 prospectively evaluated patients using the delirium rating scale-revised-98
    David J Meagher
    Alessandro Morandi
    Sharon K Inouye
    Wes Ely
    Dimitrios Adamis
    Alasdair J Maclullich
    James L Rudolph
    Karin Neufeld
    Maeve Leonard
    Giuseppe Bellelli
    Daniel Davis
    Andrew Teodorczuk
    Stefan Kreisel
    Christine Thomas
    Wolfgang Hasemann
    Suzanne Timmons
    Niamh O’Regan
    Sandeep Grover
    Faiza Jabbar
    Walter Cullen
    Colum Dunne
    Barbara Kamholz
    Barbara C Van Munster
    Sophia E De Rooij
    Jos De Jonghe
    Paula T Trzepacz
    BMC Medicine, 12
  • [42] The delirium rating scale-R-98 (DRS-R-98): A revision of the delirium rating scale (DRS)
    Trzepacz, PT
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1999, 40 (02) : 164 - 164
  • [43] Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
    Montaño, MBMM
    Ramos, LR
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2005, 39 (06): : 912 - 917
  • [44] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale
    Celik, Buket
    Bilik, Ozlem
    Kocbilek, Zeynep Deveci
    Damar, Hale Turhan
    Oz, Didem
    Denizmen, Zeynep
    IDEGGYOGYASZATI SZEMLE-CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 77 (3-4):
  • [45] On the utility of diagnostic instruments for pediatric delirium in critical illness: an evaluation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale, the Delirium Rating Scale 88, and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised R-98
    Nathalie J. J. F. Janssen
    Eva Y. L. Tan
    Marian Staal
    Eveline P. C. J. Janssen
    Piet L. J. M. Leroy
    Richel Lousberg
    Jim van Os
    Jan N. M. Schieveld
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2011, 37 : 1331 - 1337
  • [46] On the utility of diagnostic instruments for pediatric delirium in critical illness: an evaluation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale, the Delirium Rating Scale 88, and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised R-98
    Janssen, Nathalie J. J. F.
    Tan, Eva Y. L.
    Staal, Marian
    Janssen, Eveline P. C. J.
    Leroy, Piet L. J. M.
    Lousberg, Richel
    van Os, Jim
    Schieveld, Jan N. M.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 (08) : 1331 - 1337
  • [47] Validity and Reliability Analysis of Turkish Version of Childhood Autism Rating Scale
    Incekas Gassaloglu, Secil
    Baykara, Burak
    Avcil, Sibelnur
    Demiral, Yucel
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2016, 27 (04) : 266 - 274
  • [48] The German Version of the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS): Reliability and Validity
    Domes, Gregor
    Marx, Lisa
    Spenthof, Ines
    Heinrichs, Markus
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [49] Reliability and validity of the Greek version of the derogatis psychiatric rating scale (DPRS)
    Vorvolakos, Theofanis
    Samakouri, Maria
    Xenitidis, Kiriakos
    Perentzi, Maria
    Tzavaras, Nikos
    Livaditis, Miltos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 52 (06) : 501 - 511
  • [50] Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for the detection of delirium in the elderly
    Fabbri, RMA
    Moreira, MA
    Garrido, R
    Almeida, OP
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2001, 59 (2A) : 175 - 179