Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98:: reliability and validity

被引:16
|
作者
de Negreiros, Daniel Philippi [1 ]
Augusto da Silva Meleiro, Alexandrina Maria [2 ]
Furlanetto, Leticia M. [3 ]
Trzepacz, Paula T. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Postgrad Program Med Sci, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Med Sch Hosp, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Internal Med, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Mississippi, Sch Med, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
delirium; psychiatric status rating scales; validation studies;
D O I
10.1002/gps.1906
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). Methods The scale was translated into Portuguese and back-translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (n = 64; delirium, depression, dementia, schizophrenia and others) were evaluated by two independent researchers blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnosis and severity of delirium as measured by the DRS-R-98 were compared to clinical diagnosis, Mini-Mental State Exam, Confusion Assessment Method, and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Results Mean and rnedian DRS-R-98 total scores significantly distinguished delirium from the other groups (p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability (ICC between 0.9 and 1) and internal consistency (alpha = 0.91) were very high. DRS-R-98 severity scores correlated highly with the CGI. Mean DRS-R-98 severity scores during delirium differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the post-treatment values. The area under the curve established by ROC analysis was 0.99 and using the cut-off Value of 20 the scale showed sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 94.6%, respectively. Conclusion The Portuguese version of the DRS-R-98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium that distinguishes delirium from other disorders and is sensitive to change in delirium severity, which may be of great value for longitudinal studies. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 477
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Prospective Study On The Incidence, Severity, Clinical Outcome Of Delirium Using The Korean Version Of Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98(k-Drs-R98) In Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
    Moon, J. Y.
    Kim, J. L.
    Lee, M.
    Park, S. -I.
    Park, Y. -H.
    Choi, J. W.
    Park, B. M.
    Park, M. -R.
    Hwang, S.
    Jung, S. O.
    Jo, M. J.
    Park, H. S.
    Jung, S. S.
    Kim, J. O.
    Kim, S. Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [22] Delirium subtype identification and the validation of the Delirium Rating Scale - Revised-98 (Dutch version) in hospitalized elderly patients
    de Rooij, Sophia E.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Korevaar, Johanna C.
    Casteelen, Gerty
    Schuurmans, Marieke J.
    van der Mast, Roos C.
    Levi, Marcel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 21 (09) : 876 - 882
  • [23] Validity of the Portuguese version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale
    Magalhaes, Pedro V. S.
    Berk, Michael
    Cereser, Keila Maria
    Kunz, Mauricio
    Gomes, Fabiano Alves
    Fernandes, Brisa Simoes
    Jakobson, Lourenco
    Kapczinski, Flavio
    Gama, Clarissa Severino
    ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, 2010, 22 (02): : 100 - 101
  • [24] The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting
    Almuhairi, Eiman Saeed
    Badejo, Monica
    Peer, Aneesa
    Pitkanen, Mervi
    Mckenzie, Cathrine A.
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 39 (03) : 240 - 249
  • [25] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the bipolar depression rating scale
    Batmaz, Sedat
    Ozdel, Kadir
    Kocbiyik, Sibel
    Karadag, Hasan
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [26] The Korean Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: Reliability and Validity
    Kang, Eun-Chan
    Kim, Sung-Jin
    Seo, Young-Soo
    Jung, Sung-Soo
    Seo, Beom-Joo
    Ryu, Jeoung-Whan
    Shim, Joo-Cheol
    Moon, Jung-Joon
    Jeon, Dong-Wook
    Park, Kyoung-Duck
    Jung, Do-Un
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 14 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [27] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale
    Turan, Nuray
    Asti, Turkinaz Atabek
    Kaya, Nurten
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2017, 40 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [28] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hamilton depression rating scale
    Akdemir, A
    Türkçapar, MG
    Örsel, SD
    Demirergi, N
    Dag, I
    Özbay, MH
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [29] Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Calgary Depression Rating Scale
    Szafranski, T
    Jarema, M
    Ruzikowska, A
    Chóma, ME
    Kukulska, D
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2000, 41 (01) : 47 - 48
  • [30] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
    TAN Song
    NIU Hui-xia
    ZHAO Lu
    GAO Yuan
    LU Jia-meng
    SHI Chang-he
    Chandra Avinash
    WANG Rui-hao
    XU Yu-ming
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, 126 (11) : 2045 - 2048