Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98:: reliability and validity

被引:16
|
作者
de Negreiros, Daniel Philippi [1 ]
Augusto da Silva Meleiro, Alexandrina Maria [2 ]
Furlanetto, Leticia M. [3 ]
Trzepacz, Paula T. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Postgrad Program Med Sci, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Med Sch Hosp, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Internal Med, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Mississippi, Sch Med, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
delirium; psychiatric status rating scales; validation studies;
D O I
10.1002/gps.1906
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). Methods The scale was translated into Portuguese and back-translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (n = 64; delirium, depression, dementia, schizophrenia and others) were evaluated by two independent researchers blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnosis and severity of delirium as measured by the DRS-R-98 were compared to clinical diagnosis, Mini-Mental State Exam, Confusion Assessment Method, and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Results Mean and rnedian DRS-R-98 total scores significantly distinguished delirium from the other groups (p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability (ICC between 0.9 and 1) and internal consistency (alpha = 0.91) were very high. DRS-R-98 severity scores correlated highly with the CGI. Mean DRS-R-98 severity scores during delirium differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the post-treatment values. The area under the curve established by ROC analysis was 0.99 and using the cut-off Value of 20 the scale showed sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 94.6%, respectively. Conclusion The Portuguese version of the DRS-R-98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium that distinguishes delirium from other disorders and is sensitive to change in delirium severity, which may be of great value for longitudinal studies. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 477
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Dementia Rating Scale
    Chan, IHL
    Siu, AMH
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2005, 17 (01) : 69 - 79
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
    Tan Song
    Mu Hui-xia
    Zhao Lu
    Gao Yuan
    Lu Jia-meng
    Sri Chang-he
    Avinash, Chandra
    Wang Rui-hao
    Xu Yu-ming
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (11) : 2045 - 2048
  • [33] Phenotype of subsyndromal delirium using pooled multicultural Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 data
    Trzepacz, Paula T.
    Franco, Jose G.
    Meagher, David J.
    Lee, Yanghyun
    Kim, Jeong-Lan
    Kishi, Yasuhiro
    Furlanetto, Leticia M.
    Negreiros, Daniel
    Huang, Ming-Chyi
    Chen, Chun-Hsin
    Kean, Jacob
    Leonard, Maeve
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2012, 73 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [34] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 (DRS-R98)
    Thurber, Steven
    Kishi, Yasuhiro
    Trzepacz, Paula T.
    Franco, Jose G.
    Meagher, David J.
    Lee, Yanghyun
    Kim, Jeong-Lan
    Furlanetto, Leticia M.
    Negreiros, Daniel
    Huang, Ming-Chyi
    Chen, Chun-Hsin
    Kean, Jacob
    Leonard, Maeve
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2015, 27 (02) : E122 - E127
  • [35] Validity and reliability of the Intelligibility in Context Scale: European Portuguese version
    Lousada, Marisa
    Sa-Couto, Pedro
    Sutre, Diogo
    Figueiredo, Catarina
    Fazenda, Marisa
    Lousada, Maria Joao
    Valente, Ana Rita
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2019, 33 (12) : 1125 - 1138
  • [36] Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Gil, Joao N.
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Costa, Rui D.
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 118 - 119
  • [37] Concordance between DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for delirium diagnosis in a pooled database of 768 prospectively evaluated patients using the delirium rating scale-revised-98
    Meagher, David J.
    Morandi, Alessandro
    Inouye, Sharon K.
    Ely, Wes
    Adamis, Dimitrios
    Maclullich, Alasdair J.
    Rudolph, James L.
    Neufeld, Karin
    Leonard, Maeve
    Bellelli, Giuseppe
    Davis, Daniel
    Teodorczuk, Andrew
    Kreisel, Stefan
    Thomas, Christine
    Hasemann, Wolfgang
    Timmons, Suzanne
    O'Regan, Niamh
    Grover, Sandeep
    Jabbar, Faiza
    Cullen, Walter
    Dunne, Colum
    Kamholz, Barbara
    Van Munster, Barbara C.
    De Rooij, Sophia E.
    De Jonghe, Jos
    Trzepacz, Paula T.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2014, 12
  • [38] Factor Analysis of The Colombian Translation of The Delirium Rating Scale (DRS), Revised-98
    Franco, Jose G.
    Trzepacz, Paula T.
    Mejia, Mario A.
    Ochoa, Sol B.
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2009, 50 (03) : 255 - 262
  • [39] Validity and reliability of the Russian version of the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R)
    Brylev, Lev
    Demeshonok, V. S.
    Ataulina, A. I.
    Kovalchuk, M. O.
    Druzhinin, D. S.
    Guekht, A. B.
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 45 (01) : 187 - 189
  • [40] Validity and reliability of the Russian version of the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R)
    Lev Brylev
    V. S. Demeshonok
    A. I. Ataulina
    M. O. Kovalchuk
    D. S. Druzhinin
    A. B. Guekht
    Neurological Sciences, 2024, 45 : 187 - 189