Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds

被引:18
|
作者
Nguyen, Tuong L. [1 ]
Aung, Ye K. [1 ]
Li, Shuai [1 ]
Nhut Ho Trinh [1 ]
Evans, Christopher F. [1 ]
Baglietto, Laura [1 ,9 ]
Krishnan, Kavitha [1 ]
Dite, Gillian S. [1 ]
Stone, Jennifer [3 ,4 ]
English, Dallas R. [1 ,2 ]
Song, Yun-Mi [5 ]
Sung, Joohon [6 ,8 ]
Jenkins, Mark A. [1 ]
Southey, Melissa C. [7 ,10 ]
Giles, Graham G. [1 ,2 ]
Hopper, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Level 3-207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Canc Council Victoria, Canc Epidemiol & Intelligence Div, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Curtin UWA Ctr Genet Origins Hlth & Dis, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Irwon Ro 81, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[7] Univ Melbourne, Dept Pathol, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[8] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Hlth & Environm, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[9] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Pisa, Italy
[10] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci Monash Hlth, Precis Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2018年 / 20卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Breast cancer; Masking effect; Interval cancer; Screen-detected; Nested case-control cohort study; Australian women; Mammography; Mammographic density; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; RISK; ASSOCIATIONS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-018-1081-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundCase-control studies show that mammographic density is a better risk factor when defined at higher than conventional pixel-brightness thresholds. We asked if this applied to interval and/or screen-detected cancers.MethodWe conducted a nested case-control study within the prospective Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study including 168 women with interval and 422 with screen-detected breast cancers, and 498 and 1197 matched controls, respectively. We measured absolute and percent mammographic density using the Cumulus software at the conventional threshold (Cumulus) and two increasingly higher thresholds (Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus, respectively). Measures were transformed and adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI). Using conditional logistic regression and adjusting for BMI by age at mammogram, we estimated risk discrimination by the odds ratioper adjusted standard deviation (OPERA), calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared nested models using the likelihood ratio criterion and models with the same number of parameters using the difference in Bayesian information criterion (BIC).ResultsFor interval cancer, there was very strong evidence that the association was best predicted by Cumulus as a percentage (OPERA=2.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85-2.92); all BIC >14), and the association with BMI was independent of age at mammogram. After adjusting for percent Cumulus, no other measure was associated with risk (all P>0.1). For screen-detected cancer, however, the associations were strongest for the absolute and percent Cirrocumulus measures (all BIC >6), and after adjusting for Cirrocumulus, no other measure was associated with risk (all P>0.07).ConclusionThe amount of brighter areas is the best mammogram-based measure of screen-detected breast cancer risk, while the percentage of the breast covered by white or bright areas is the best mammogram-based measure of interval breast cancer risk, irrespective of BMI. Therefore, there are different features of mammographic images that give clinically important information about different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme
    Timmermans, Lore
    Bleyen, Luc
    Bacher, Klaus
    Van Herck, Koen
    Lemmens, Kim
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Van Steen, Andre
    Martens, Patrick
    De Brabander, Isabel
    Goossens, Mathieu
    Thierens, Hubert
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (09) : 3810 - 3819
  • [32] Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme
    Lore Timmermans
    Luc Bleyen
    Klaus Bacher
    Koen Van Herck
    Kim Lemmens
    Chantal Van Ongeval
    Andre Van Steen
    Patrick Martens
    Isabel De Brabander
    Mathieu Goossens
    Hubert Thierens
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 3810 - 3819
  • [33] THE CURRENT DETECTABILITY OF BREAST-CANCER IN A MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING-PROGRAM - A REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS MAMMOGRAMS OF INTERVAL AND SCREEN-DETECTED CANCERS
    VANDIJCK, JAAM
    VERBEEK, ALM
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    HOLLAND, R
    CANCER, 1993, 72 (06) : 1933 - 1938
  • [34] Breast cancer genetic risk profile is differentially associated with interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Li, J.
    Holm, J.
    Bergh, J.
    Eriksson, M.
    Darabi, H.
    Lindstrom, L. S.
    Tornberg, S.
    Hall, P.
    Czene, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (03) : 517 - 522
  • [35] Differences between screen-detected and interval breast cancers among BRCA mutation carriers
    Pilewskie, Melissa
    Zabor, Emily C.
    Gilbert, Elizabeth
    Stempel, Michelle
    Petruolo, Oriana
    Mangino, Debra
    Robson, Mark
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (01) : 141 - 148
  • [36] Differences between screen-detected and interval breast cancers among BRCA mutation carriers
    Melissa Pilewskie
    Emily C. Zabor
    Elizabeth Gilbert
    Michelle Stempel
    Oriana Petruolo
    Debra Mangino
    Mark Robson
    Maxine S. Jochelson
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 175 : 141 - 148
  • [37] Missed and True Interval and Screen-detected Breast Cancers in a Population Based Screening Program
    Hoff, Solveig Roth
    Samset, Jon Helge
    Abrahamsen, Anne-Line
    Vigeland, Einar
    Klepp, Olbjorn
    Hofvind, Solveig
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (04) : 454 - 460
  • [38] Should screen-detected breast cancers be managed differently?
    Krzyzanowska, MK
    Tannock, IF
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (16): : 1170 - 1171
  • [39] Prognosis of small screen-detected invasive breast cancers
    Ellis, I.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (Suppl 3)
  • [40] Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers
    Palka, Istvan
    Kelemen, Gyoengyi
    Ormandi, Katalin
    Lazar, Gyoergy
    Nyari, Tibor
    Thurzo, Laszlo
    Kahan, Zsuzsanna
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (02) : 161 - 167