Breast cancer genetic risk profile is differentially associated with interval and screen-detected breast cancers

被引:35
|
作者
Li, J. [1 ]
Holm, J. [1 ]
Bergh, J. [2 ,3 ]
Eriksson, M. [1 ]
Darabi, H. [1 ]
Lindstrom, L. S. [4 ,5 ]
Tornberg, S. [6 ]
Hall, P. [1 ]
Czene, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Box 281, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oncol & Pathol, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Hosp, Canc Ctr Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Biosci & Nutr, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] St Gorans Univ Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Stockholm Gotland Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Screening, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
polygenic risk score; personalized medicine; MAMMOGRAPHIC DETECTION; TRUE INTERVAL; PROGRAM; DENSITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdu565
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Polygenic risk profiles computed from multiple common susceptibility alleles for breast cancer have been shown to identify women at different levels of breast cancer risk. We evaluated whether this genetic risk stratification can also be applied to discriminate between screen-detected and interval cancers, which are usually associated with clinicopathological and survival differences. Patients and methods: A 77 single-nucleotide polymorphism polygenic risk score (PRS) was constructed for breast cancer overall and by estrogen receptor (ER) status. PRS was inspected as a continuous (per standard deviation increment) variable in a case-only design. Modification of the PRS by mammographic density was evaluated by fitting an additional interaction term. Results: PRS weighted by breast cancer overall estimates was found to be differentially associated with 1865 screen-detected and 782 interval cancers in the LIBRO-1 study {age-adjusted odds ratio (OR)(perSD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.91 [0.83-0.99], P = 0.023}. The association was found to be more significant for PRS weighted by ER-positive breast cancer estimates [ORperSD = 0.90 (0.82-0.98), P = 0.011]. This result was corroborated by two independent studies [combined ORperSD = 0.87 (0.76-1.00), P = 0.058] with no evidence of heterogeneity. When enriched for 'true' interval cancers among nondense breasts, the difference in the association with PRS in screen-detected and interval cancers became more pronounced [ORperSD = 0.74 (0.62-0.89), P = 0.001], with a significant interaction effect between PRS and mammographic density (P-interaction = 0.017). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first report looking into the genetic differences between screen-detected and interval cancers. It is an affirmation that the two types of breast cancer may have unique underlying biology.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 522
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast cancer genetic risk profile is differentially associated with interval and screen-detected breast cancers (vol 26, pg 517, 2015)
    Li, J.
    Holm, J.
    Bergh, J.
    Eriksson, M.
    Darabi, H.
    Lindstrom, L. S.
    Tornberg, S.
    Hall, P.
    Czene, K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (06) : 1181 - 1181
  • [2] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Tupper, Carl A.
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Astley, Susan
    Bydder, Megan
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Harkness, Elaine
    Lim, Yit Y.
    Wilson, Mary
    Morris, Julie
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
  • [3] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Carl A Tupper
    Anthony J Maxwell
    Susan Astley
    Megan Bydder
    Soujanya Gadde
    Elaine Harkness
    Yit Y Lim
    Mary Wilson
    Julie Morris
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 17
  • [4] Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Gilliland, FD
    Joste, N
    Stauber, PM
    Hunt, WC
    Rosenberg, R
    Redlich, G
    Key, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (09) : 743 - 749
  • [5] Molecular comparison of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Cheasley, Dane
    Li, Na
    Rowley, Simone M.
    Elder, Kenneth
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Loi, Sherene
    Savas, Peter
    Goode, David L.
    Kader, Tanjina
    Zethoven, Magnus
    Semple, Tim
    Fox, Stephen B.
    Pang, Jia-Min
    Byrne, David
    Devereux, Lisa
    Nickson, Carolyn
    Procopio, Pietro
    Lee, Grant
    Hughes, Siobhan
    Saunders, Hugo
    Fujihara, Kenji M.
    Kuykhoven, Keilly
    Connaughton, Jacquie
    James, Paul A.
    Gorringe, Kylie L.
    Campbell, Ian G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 248 (02): : 243 - 252
  • [6] The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study
    Wanders, Johanna O. P.
    Holland, Katharina
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
  • [7] The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study
    Johanna O. P. Wanders
    Katharina Holland
    Nico Karssemeijer
    Petra H. M. Peeters
    Wouter B. Veldhuis
    Ritse M. Mann
    Carla H. van Gils
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 19
  • [8] Re: Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Eisinger, F
    Juliain-Reynier, C
    Sobol, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (18) : 1533 - 1534
  • [9] 'True' interval breast cancers have worse tumour characteristics and survival compared to screen-detected breast cancers, while missed screen-detected breast cancers have not
    de Munckl, L.
    Siesling, S.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    van der Vegt, B.
    de Bock, G. H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S76 - S76
  • [10] Molecular comparison of interval and screen-detected breast cancers.
    Cheasley, Dane Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)